FBS CONFERENCE · 2025 SEASON
SEC
THE LONG WAIT · 2025
The Standard
The SEC placed Indiana, Tennessee, and three others in the 2025 CFP field and came away with Indiana's first national title — the conference's ninth in eleven years. No other conference has touched the College Football Playoff at this rate.
Can anyone break the SEC's stranglehold on the CFP, or does the bracket look the same in 2026?
Conference Standings · SEC · 2025
Standings
| # | Team | Conf |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ole Miss | 8–1 |
| 2 | Texas A&M | 7–1 |
| 3 | Georgia | 8–2 |
| 4 | Alabama | 8–2 |
| 5 | Vanderbilt | 6–2 |
| 6 | Texas | 6–2 |
| 7 | Oklahoma | 6–3 |
| 8 | Tennessee | 4–4 |
| 9 | Missouri | 4–4 |
| 10 | LSU | 3–5 |
| 11 | Kentucky | 2–6 |
| 12 | Florida | 2–6 |
| 13 | Auburn | 1–7 |
| 14 | Mississippi State | 1–7 |
| 15 | South Carolina | 1–7 |
| 16 | Arkansas | 0–8 |
Conference record determines standing. Power = neutral-field pts vs. all-level average. Last 5 = most recent game results.
Projected Standings · SEC · 2026
Win Projection
Preseason model — odds of winning at least N conference games, from current power ratings. Tiers rank projected strength; AVG = expected conference wins.
| # | Team | W–L | PWR | AVG | ≥9 | ≥8 | ≥7 | ≥6 | ≥5 | ≥4 | ≥3 | ≥2 | ≥1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Favorites | |||||||||||||
| 1 | Ole Miss | 6–3 | +4.6 | 5.5 | 1 | 8 | 25 | 51 | 76 | 92 | 98 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 2 | Georgia | 5–4 | +3.8 | 5.3 | 1 | 6 | 21 | 46 | 71 | 89 | 97 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 3 | Vanderbilt | 5–4 | +2.5 | 5.1 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 39 | 65 | 85 | 96 | 99 | ✓ |
| Challengers | |||||||||||||
| 4 | Texas A&M | 5–4 | +1.8 | 4.9 | 4 | 14 | 35 | 62 | 83 | 95 | 99 | ✓ | |
| 5 | Texas | 5–4 | +1.8 | 4.9 | 3 | 14 | 35 | 61 | 83 | 95 | 99 | ✓ | |
| 6 | Alabama | 5–4 | +1.1 | 4.7 | 3 | 11 | 30 | 56 | 79 | 93 | 99 | ✓ | |
| 7 | Tennessee | 5–4 | +0.4 | 4.7 | 2 | 11 | 29 | 55 | 79 | 93 | 99 | ✓ | |
| 8 | Oklahoma | 5–4 | +0.6 | 4.7 | 2 | 11 | 29 | 55 | 79 | 93 | 99 | ✓ | |
| The Field | |||||||||||||
| 9 | Missouri | 5–4 | +0.2 | 4.6 | 2 | 10 | 28 | 54 | 78 | 93 | 99 | ✓ | |
| 10 | Auburn | 4–5 | -0.3 | 4.4 | 1 | 7 | 22 | 47 | 73 | 90 | 98 | ✓ | |
| 11 | South Carolina | 4–5 | -1.5 | 4.4 | 1 | 7 | 22 | 46 | 72 | 90 | 98 | ✓ | |
| 12 | LSU | 4–5 | -1.5 | 4.2 | 1 | 5 | 18 | 40 | 67 | 87 | 97 | ✓ | |
| 13 | Kentucky | 4–5 | -2.7 | 3.9 | 1 | 4 | 13 | 33 | 59 | 82 | 95 | 99 | |
| Rebuilding | |||||||||||||
| 14 | Arkansas | 4–5 | -2.9 | 3.8 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 31 | 57 | 81 | 95 | 99 | |
| 15 | Florida | 4–5 | -3.0 | 3.6 | 2 | 10 | 27 | 52 | 78 | 93 | 99 | ||
| 16 | Mississippi State | 3–6 | -4.8 | 3.4 | 2 | 7 | 22 | 46 | 73 | 91 | 99 | ||
Conference Power · FBS
Where We Stand
| # | Conference | Avg Power |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | SECYou are here | |
| 2 | Big Ten | |
| 3 | ACC | |
| 4 | Big 12 | |
| 5 | American Athletic | |
| 6 | Mountain West | |
| 7 | Sun Belt | |
| 8 | Mid-American | |
| 9 | Conference USA |
Round-robin power = strength of schedule-adjusted conference average, points vs. all-level average team. Record = SEC's record vs. that conference across all games this season.
Championship market · 2025
Sec Title odds
| # | Team | Best odds | Books |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Georgia | +260 | 6bk |
| 2 | Texas | +265 | 6bk |
| 3 | Texas A&M | +800 | 6bk |
| 4 | Alabama | +800 | 6bk |
| 5 | LSU | +600 | 6bk |
| 6 | Ole Miss | +800 | 6bk |
| 7 | Oklahoma | +1200 | 6bk |
| 8 | Tennessee | +1700 | 6bk |
| 9 | Florida | +1600 | 6bk |
| 10 | Missouri | +3000 | 6bk |
| 11 | Auburn | +3000 | 6bk |
| 12 | South Carolina | +4000 | 6bk |
| 13 | Vanderbilt | +8000 | 6bk |
| 14 | Kentucky | +12500 | 6bk |
| 15 | Arkansas | +20000 | 6bk |
| 16 | Mississippi State | +20000 | 6bk |
Sportsbook consensus — best odds across multiple books · 2026-06-22 · American odds (e.g. +450 means bet $100 to win $450)
SEC carries real selection-room weight with 5 teams inside the top 25 and Ole Miss driving a legitimate national ceiling.
League Drivers
SEC Team Board
The league stack, sorted by predictive strength. Power is shown as neutral-field points versus the all-level average team, while resume is shown on a 0-100 season score.
| Rank | Team | Record | Power | Resume | ATS | Wins vs Market | Recent Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #8 | Ole Miss | 13-2 | +20.0 | 100 | 9-6 | +2.47 | 3-1 over the last 4 (W14 W17 W18 L19) |
| #10 | Georgia | 12-2 | +19.2 | 99 | 6-8 | +1.15 | 3-1 over the last 4 (W13 W14 W15 L18) |
| #18 | Vanderbilt | 10-3 | +17.9 | 97 | 10-3 | +1.76 | 3-1 over the last 4 (W11 W13 W14 L18) |
| #23 | Texas A&M | 11-2 | +17.2 | 99 | 5-8 | +1.30 | 2-2 over the last 4 (W12 W13 L14 L17) |
| #25 | Texas | 10-3 | +17.2 | 96 | 5-8 | +0.86 | 3-1 over the last 4 (L12 W13 W14 W18) |
| #32 | Alabama | 11-4 | +16.5 | 97 | 8-5 | +0.31 | 2-2 over the last 4 (W14 L15 W17 L18) |
| #39 | Oklahoma | 10-3 | +16.0 | 97 | 7-6 | +0.99 | 3-1 over the last 4 (W12 W13 W14 L17) |
| #44 | Tennessee | 8-5 | +15.8 | 90 | 5-8 | -1.24 | 2-2 over the last 4 (W12 W13 L14 L18) |
| #46 | Missouri | 8-5 | +15.6 | 90 | 6-6 | -0.46 | 2-2 over the last 4 (W12 L13 W14 L18) |
| #54 | Auburn | 5-7 | +15.1 | 83 | 4-7 | -2.05 | 1-3 over the last 4 (L10 L11 W13 L14) |
| #71 | LSU | 7-6 | +13.9 | 87 | 4-9 | -0.94 | 2-2 over the last 4 (W12 W13 L14 L18) |
| #73 | South Carolina | 4-8 | +13.9 | 74 | 6-6 | -2.00 | 1-3 over the last 4 (L10 L12 W13 L14) |
| #89 | Kentucky | 5-7 | +12.7 | 70 | 5-7 | -1.00 | 2-2 over the last 4 (W11 W12 L13 L14) |
| #96 | Arkansas | 2-10 | +12.5 | 64 | 4-8 | -4.12 | 0-4 over the last 4 (L10 L12 L13 L14) |
| #97 | Florida | 4-8 | +12.4 | 61 | 5-7 | -2.06 | 1-3 over the last 4 (L11 L12 L13 W14) |
| #148 | Mississippi State | 5-8 | +10.6 | 66 | 7-5 | -0.10 | 0-4 over the last 4 (L11 L12 L14 L19) |
Biggest Risers
Rank movement since the most recent refresh.
Biggest Faders
Teams whose stock dropped most since the last refresh.
ATS Leaders
Who beat the number most often this season.
| Team | Cover Rate | Record |
|---|---|---|
| Vanderbilt | 76.9% | 10-3 ATS |
| Alabama | 61.5% | 8-5 ATS |
| Ole Miss | 60.0% | 9-6 ATS |
| Mississippi State | 58.3% | 7-5 ATS |
| Oklahoma | 53.8% | 7-6 ATS |
Wins vs Market
Win total minus the market's implied expectation, by team.
| Team | Wins vs Market | Sample |
|---|---|---|
| Ole Miss | +2.47 | 15 lined games |
| Vanderbilt | +1.76 | 13 lined games |
| Texas A&M | +1.30 | 13 lined games |
| Georgia | +1.15 | 14 lined games |
| Oklahoma | +0.99 | 13 lined games |
Depth & Parity
How wide the league's power spread runs from top to bottom.