CFB Zeitgeist Score
85
All-Conference in the position cohort. Carried by rec yards at the 89th percentile.
Victor Snow
Below the discourse floor — the honest stats-only state.
815 REC YDS · 62 REC · 8 REC TD
Where He Ended Up · Transfer
Transferred to NC State
WR · BUFFALO · MID-AMERICAN
CFB Zeitgeist Score
85
All-Conference in the position cohort. Carried by rec yards at the 89th percentile.
Heisman Heat
#413
<1% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
<1%
TOP WR AWARD
Biletnikoff
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 2 · StarterStarter. A locked-in starting role.
Career arc · Season-by-season Standing
4 seasons on the ladder
2022
Nevada · WR
—
2023
Buffalo · WR
—
2024
Buffalo · WR
R09 · All-Conference HM / 2nd team
Recognized
2025
Buffalo · WR
R09 · All-Conference HM / 2nd team
Recognized
Development Trajectory · receiving yards
2022–2025Up 81400% from first season to most-recent.
Career Arc
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No recruiting profile is on file for this player. | ||
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Buffalo -> NC State | 3-star | 0.8600 | Immediate |
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Selector Grid · 2025
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment ·
Belief Meter
—
Awaiting per-cohort signal
Top Take
“”
Trajectory
Rival Radar
Only 2 rival mention(s) — below the 4-mention floor for a defensible read.
2025 Signature · 2025 season
815
yds
All FBS WRs, min 20 receptions
Why it matters
#59 of 531 All FBS WRs in receiving yards — 815 yards on 62 receptions.
Vs cohort
HIGH · n=62 cohort 531
Signature Moment
Week 6 vs Eastern Michigan — 136 receiving_yards_total
Result W 31-30
The week the volume broke through — put up 136 yds vs Eastern Michigan.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the receiving totals stand
✓ Hit 700-yard receiver · finished with 815.
To hit 1,000-yard receiver (currently 815): needs 185/game over remaining 1.
✓ Hit 60-catch season · finished with 62.
To hit 80-catch season (currently 62): needs 18/game over remaining 1.
✓ Hit 8 receiving TDs · finished with 8.
To hit 10 receiving TDs (currently 8): needs 2/game over remaining 1.
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
The useful clue on this card is not just the Heisman rank, but the broader honors spine. Victor Snow already has 3 loaded recognition items, which helps distinguish a player who is merely productive from one who is already earning selector-level validation.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
Target magnet | All-purpose weapon against FBS receiving peers.
2025 season snapshot | final
Receiving
Rushing
Returns
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 12 games
| Wk | Opp | REC | YDS | AVG | TD | LONG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | L 10-23@ Minnesota | 5 | 67 | 13.4 | 1 | 40 | |
| Wk 2 | W 45-6vs St. Francis (PA) | 3 | 67 | 22.3 | 1 | 39 | |
| Wk 3 | W 31-28@ Kent State | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 1 | 22 | |
| Wk 4 | L 17-21vs Troy | 5 | 38 | 7.6 | 0 | 17 | |
| Wk 5 | L 17-20vs UConn | 7 | 68 | 9.7 | 0 | 27 | |
| Wk 6 | W 31-30vs Eastern Michigan | 6 | 136 | 22.7 | 2 | 75 | Season-high 136 yds |
| Wk 8 | W 28-21@ Massachusetts | 8 | 112 | 14.0 | 2 | 37 | 2 TD catches |
| Wk 9 | L 16-24vs Akron | 7 | 56 | 8.0 | 0 | 15 | |
| Wk 10 | W 28-3@ Bowling Green | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 | 8 | |
| Wk 12 | L 19-38@ Central Michigan | 4 | 36 | 9.0 | 0 | 15 | |
| Wk 13 | L 20-37vs Miami (OH) | 9 | 111 | 12.3 | 1 | 26 | |
| Wk 14 | L 26-31vs Ohio | 4 | 82 | 20.5 | 0 | 58 | |
| Total | 62 | 815 | 13.2 | 8 | 75 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
The player's share of a team's passing-game involvement. It is the fastest way to see whether the receiver is a true focal point or more of a complementary piece.
A blended workload view that accounts for catches, designed touches, and any return-game involvement that shapes the overall profile.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Receiving | Receptions | 62 | #50/1110 | 96th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving yards | 815 | #62/1107 | 94th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving TD | 8 | #23/1111 | 98th pct | Scoringvs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Yards / catch | 13.1 | #441/1106 | 60th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Returns | Kick return yards | 29 | #161/238 | 33rd pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Returns | Punt return yards | 213 | #17/224 | 93rd pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Usage | Pass share | 19.6% | #98/1137 | 91st pct | Air-game usagevs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Rushing yards | 91 | #26/397 | 94th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Rushing LONG | 44 | #17/346 | 95th pct | Metricvs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Carries | 12 | #37/407 | 91st pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Yards / carry | 7.6 | #90/393 | 77th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Rush TD | 2 | #7/411 | 99th pct | Scoringvs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving LONG | 75 | #47/1105 | 96th pct | Metricvs FBS WR |
| Returns | Punt returns | 20 | #15/237 | 94th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Returns | Kick return avg | 14.5 | #181/236 | 24th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Returns | Punt return avg | 10.7 | #66/222 | 71st pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Returns | Kick returns | 2 | #132/243 | 46th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Returns | Punt return TD | 1 | #4/27 | 89th pct | Scoringvs FBS WR |
| Usage | 3rd-down usage | 12.6% | #109/1137 | 91st pct | Money-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | 1st-down usage | 12.1% | #40/1137 | 97th pct | Early-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Passing-down usage | 11.5% | #160/1137 | 86th pct | Known-passing sharevs FBS WR |
| Usage | Role share | 10.6% | #74/1137 | 94th pct | Share of team offensevs FBS WR |
| Usage | Standard-down usage | 10.2% | #61/1137 | 95th pct | Base-situation sharevs FBS WR |
| Usage | 2nd-down usage | 7.4% | #276/1137 | 76th pct | Middle-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Rush share | 1.8% | #114/1137 | 90th pct | Ground-game usagevs FBS WR |
| Ball Security | Fumbles lost | 0 | #1/302 | 100th pct | Turnoversvs FBS WR |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
ALL-CONF HM
ALL-CONF HM · Rung 9 of 16
Why he’s here
All-Conference honorable mention / 2nd team — the recognition has started.
What moves him up
A best-at-position run lifts to 1st team.
What moves him down
A back-end conference finish drops out of the honor list.
Accolade streams
Heisman model tracks the top FBS contenders weekly; this player hasn't entered the watch list yet.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 12 games
Home vs Road
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home7g | 5.9 | 79.7 | 14.7 | 0.6 |
| Road5g | 4.2 | 51.4 | 11.1 | 0.8 |
Win vs Loss
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins5g | 4.2 | 71.4 | 15.7 | 1.2 |
| Losses7g | 5.9 | 65.4 | 11.5 | 0.3 |
First half vs Second half
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-76g | 4.8 | 68.3 | 14.5 | 0.8 |
| Weeks 8+6g | 5.5 | 67.5 | 12.0 | 0.5 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the WR cohort
Elite: rush tds (95th). Strength: rec tds (94th).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Advanced Savant · WR · 2024
Advanced opponent-adjusted percentile bars are coming soon for this player.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
Runs precise routes in tight quarters. Volume player who keeps chains moving.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Victor Snow’s 2024 season.
Victor Snow
Kamdyn Benjamin
Silas Bolden
Kole Wilson
Tyrin Smith
Matches Victor on
Differs from Victor on
Through 2 college seasons, his career arc tracks closest to Taylor Grimes’s path through Incarnate Word.
Taylor Grimes
Tyler Vaughns
Ramaud Chiaokhiao-Bowman
Cam'Ron Lacy
Hunter Long
Matches Taylor on
As a senior, his production profile tracks closest to Junior Vandeross's senior season at Toledo (2025).
Junior Vandeross
Isaiah Sategna
Kamdyn Benjamin
Anthony Gould
Phillip Brooks III
Matches Junior on
Differs from Junior on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Pete Lembo
Pass share
49.8%
409 pass / 413 run
Plays / game
68.5
12 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
7.4%
338 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Balanced.
Coaching Lineage · 2022–2025
2 coachesCoaching transition mid-career: Maurice Linguist → Pete Lembo. Worth noting in scheme + development context.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Trophy Case · Confirmed honors
What the selectors said
ALL-CONFERENCE · 1ST TEAM
All-Conf 1st team (2025)
All-MAC
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
Conference-level recognition helps anchor whether a player is merely statistically loud or actually viewed as elite within his competitive lane.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | All-MAC | all_conference | Buffalo | MAC | RET |
| 2025 | All-MAC | all_conference | Buffalo | MAC | WR |
| 2024 | All-MAC | all_conference | Buffalo | MAC | WR |
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
Team, conference, and class by season.