CFB Zeitgeist Score
65
Solid starter in the position cohort. Carried by yards / att at the 81st percentile.
Jake Retzlaff
Retzlaff posted 3,168 passing yards and 634 rushing yards at Tulane last season, then changed programs again heading into 2026.
RUSHING VALUE · WEPA
+0.37
via your WEPA model · 2025 · 121 plays
80th-percentile reputation, 68th-percentile tape — somewhere in that 12-point gap is who he really is.
AI narrative · updated 2026-06-22 · compiled from CFB Zeitgeist data
2026 Outlook
Returning to Tulane for 2026
2026 Depth chart
Projected starter
Quarterback · Tulane
Returning around him
2026 Award watch
No preseason watch lists yet (most drop June 15 – July 15)
Tulane · Last season: 11-3 (AP #17) · Talent rank #68 · 2026 recruiting class #74
QB · TULANE · AMERICAN ATHLETIC
CFB Zeitgeist Score
65
Solid starter in the position cohort. Carried by yards / att at the 81st percentile.
Heisman Heat
#8
4.6% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
4.6%
TOP QB AWARD
Davey O'Brien
In contention
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 4 · EliteAll-American. Named to an NCAA-recognized All-America team.
Career arc · Season-by-season Standing
3 seasons on the ladder
2023
BYU · QB
—
2024
BYU · QB
R08 · Watch-list name
Recognized
2025
Tulane · QB
—
Development Trajectory · passing yards
2023–2025Up 389% from first season to most-recent.
Career Arc
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 3-star | 0.8556 | No. 78 recruit | JUCO | BYU |
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | BYU -> -- | 4-star | 0.9000 | Immediate |
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Achievements
Selector Grid · 2025
Selector recognition fills in once the major honors lists (AP, FWAA, AFCA, Walter Camp, Sporting News, SI) are scraped and ingested.
NIL · Recruiting · NFL Draft
Market value, pedigree & pro outcome
Recruit stars
★★★☆☆
to BYU
Composite
0.8556
#78 national
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment · Season 2025 conversation window
Belief Meter
60
Quietly Bullish
Top Take
“”
Trajectory
Rival Radar
Signature Story
He hasn't written his page yet — we'll start filling it in when there are enough snaps to rank against his peers.
Signature Moment
No signature moment on the ledger yet.
Returns once this player puts together a multi-game body of work — single-game flashes alone don't clear the bar.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the passing totals stand
✓ Hit 3,000-yard season · finished with 3,168.
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
The unusual part of Jake Retzlaff's case is that the production comes in two channels, not one. For Tulane, he has 3,168 passing yards and 15 touchdown passes, but he also adds 634 rushing yards and 16 rushing scores. That kind of dual-threat load tends to create a more resilient Heisman case because the offense can tilt the game in multiple ways.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
High-volume passer | Dual-threat against FBS QB peers. The quickest read is whether the profile wins on volume, efficiency, explosiveness, or rushing value.
2025 season snapshot | final
Passing Efficiency
Passing Production
Rushing
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 14 games
| Wk | Opp | CMP/ATT | YDS | TD | INT | YPA | QBR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | W 23-3vs Northwestern | 18/31 | 152 | 1 | 0 | 4.9 | 77.7 | |
| Wk 2 | W 33-31@ South Alabama | 13/24 | 125 | 1 | 0 | 5.2 | 74.5 | |
| Wk 3 | W 34-27vs Duke | 15/23 | 245 | 0 | 0 | 10.7 | 94.7 | |
| Wk 4 | L 10-45@ Ole Miss | 5/17 | 56 | 0 | 0 | 3.3 | 37.2 | |
| Wk 5 | W 31-14@ Tulsa | 17/30 | 242 | 0 | 0 | 8.1 | 59.0 | |
| Wk 7 | W 26-19vs East Carolina | 26/36 | 347 | 2 | 0 | 9.6 | 79.6 | Season-high 347 yds |
| Wk 8 | W 24-17vs Army | 22/29 | 261 | 2 | 1 | 9.0 | 89.9 | |
| Wk 10 | L 26-48@ UTSA | 14/28 | 194 | 1 | 2 | 6.9 | 58.3 | |
| Wk 11 | W 38-32@ Memphis | 16/23 | 332 | 3 | 0 | 14.4 | 95.4 | 3 TD passes |
| Wk 12 | W 35-24vs Florida Atlantic | 18/27 | 241 | 2 | 1 | 8.9 | 67.5 | |
| Wk 13 | W 37-13@ Temple | 17/28 | 231 | 2 | 0 | 8.3 | 68.6 | |
| Wk 14 | W 27-0vs Charlotte | 28/38 | 291 | 0 | 2 | 7.7 | 39.3 | |
| Wk 15 | W 34-21vs North Texas | 13/22 | 145 | 0 | 0 | 6.6 | 76.9 | |
| Bowl | L 10-41@ Ole Miss | 20/35 | 306 | 1 | 1 | 8.7 | 37.9 | |
| Total | 242/391 | 3168 | 15 | 7 | 8.0 | 68.3 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
Opponent-adjusted passing value. Positive numbers mean the quarterback is adding more value through the air than a neutral peer would in the same environment.
How much of the offense runs through the quarterback once passing and rushing responsibility are blended together.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passing | Passing yards | 3,168 | #26/382 | 93rd pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Pass TD | 15 | #71/407 | 83rd pct | Scoringvs FBS QB |
| Passing | Completions | 242 | #44/383 | 89th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Completion % | 61.9% | #184/383 | 52nd pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Passing | Yards / attempt | 8.1 | #86/382 | 78th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rushing yards | 634 | #21/408 | 95th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Value | Passing WEPA | +0.33 | #57/200 | 72nd pct | Opponent-adjusted passing value | 396 weighted playsvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Role share | 53.0% | #57/428 | 87th pct | Share of team offensevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Attempts | 391 | #31/407 | 93rd pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Interceptions | 7 | #316/407 | 23rd pct | Turnoversvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Carries | 129 | #32/408 | 92nd pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rushing LONG | 69 | #12/391 | 97th pct | Metricvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rush TD | 16 | #3/408 | 100th pct | Scoringvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Yards / carry | 4.9 | #100/407 | 76th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Pass share | 90.5% | #54/428 | 88th pct | Air-game usagevs FBS QB |
| Usage | 3rd-down usage | 74.1% | #21/428 | 95th pct | Money-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Passing-down usage | 61.3% | #101/428 | 77th pct | Known-passing sharevs FBS QB |
| Usage | Standard-down usage | 49.6% | #36/428 | 92nd pct | Base-situation sharevs FBS QB |
| Usage | 2nd-down usage | 48.2% | #93/428 | 79th pct | Middle-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | 1st-down usage | 46.7% | #53/428 | 88th pct | Early-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Rush share | 21.9% | #53/428 | 88th pct | Ground-game usagevs FBS QB |
| Value | Rushing WEPA | +0.37 | #18/140 | 88th pct | Opponent-adjusted rushing value | 121 weighted playsvs FBS QB |
| Ball Security | Fumbles lost | 4 | #237/258 | 9th pct | Turnoversvs FBS QB |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION · Rung None of 16
Why he’s here
Standing classification populates when honors, Heisman, and roster signals all align.
What moves him up
What moves him down
Accolade streams
Heisman model tracks the top FBS contenders weekly; this player hasn't entered the watch list yet.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 14 games
Home vs Road
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home7g | 240 | 1.0 | 8.2 | 0.6 |
| Road7g | 212 | 1.1 | 7.8 | 0.4 |
Win vs Loss
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins11g | 237 | 1.2 | 8.5 | 0.4 |
| Losses3g | 185 | 0.7 | 6.3 | 1.0 |
First half vs Second half
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-77g | 210 | 0.7 | 7.2 | 0.1 |
| Weeks 8+7g | 242 | 1.4 | 8.8 | 0.9 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the QB cohort
Elite: rush tds (98th). Strength: rush yards (88th). Concern: fumbles lost (8th).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Pass Profile · Completion depth (PBP)
Where the throws are landing
Short
0–9 ydsMiddle
10–19 ydsDeep
20+ ydsOverall 59.4% completion on 187 attempts · 15 deep completions averaging 31.1 yds.
Advanced Savant · QB · 2024
Reads as a mid-tier profile across the board..
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
Dangerous with both arm and legs — defenses can't just pin the ears back.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Anthony Colandrea’s 2025 season.
Anthony Colandrea
Brady Cook
Todd Centeio
Jaren Hall
Spencer Sanders
Matches Anthony on
Differs from Anthony on
Through 3 college seasons, his career arc tracks closest to Timmy McClain’s path through Bethune-Cookman.
Timmy McClain
Logan Bonner
Ryan Staub
Dennis Grosel
Jake Constantine
Matches Timmy on
As a junior, his production profile tracks closest to Anthony Colandrea's junior season at UNLV (2025).
Anthony Colandrea
Brady Cook
John Rhys Plumlee
JC French
Owen McCown
Matches Anthony on
Differs from Anthony on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Jon Sumrall
Pass share
45.8%
424 pass / 501 run
Plays / game
66.1
14 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
3.4%
294 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Run-leaning.
Coaching Lineage · 2023–2025
2 coachesCoaching transition mid-career: Slade Nagle → Jon Sumrall. Worth noting in scheme + development context.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
All-America, all-conference, player-of-the-week, watch-list, and postseason awards land here when they're earned. The absence is the signal: most players never collect formal honors, and that's its own kind of context.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No formal honors on the ledger yet. All-America, all-conference, weekly awards, watch lists, and postseason trophies land here when they’re earned. | ||||
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
Team, conference, and class by season.