CFB Zeitgeist Score
49
Mid-pack in the position cohort. Carried by yards / catch at the 60th percentile.
Zycarl Lewis Jr.
Below the discourse floor — the honest stats-only state.
330 REC YDS · 24 REC · 2 REC TD
2026 Outlook
Returning to Tulane for 2026
2026 Depth chart
Projected starter
Wide receiver · Tulane
Returning around him
2026 Award watch
No preseason watch lists yet (most drop June 15 – July 15)
Tulane · Last season: 11-3 (AP #17) · Talent rank #68 · 2026 recruiting class #74
WR · TULANE · AMERICAN ATHLETIC
CFB Zeitgeist Score
49
Mid-pack in the position cohort. Carried by yards / catch at the 60th percentile.
Heisman Heat
#3573
<1% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
<1%
TOP WR AWARD
Biletnikoff
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 2 · StarterPart-time starter. Splitting first-team reps.
Development Trajectory · receiving yards
2024–2025Up 2100% from first season to most-recent.
Career Arc
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No recruiting profile is on file for this player. | ||
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No transfer portal moves on file for this player. | ||
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Selector Grid · 2025
Selector recognition fills in once the major honors lists (AP, FWAA, AFCA, Walter Camp, Sporting News, SI) are scraped and ingested.
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment · Awaiting signal
The Room reads fan conversation around a player — who’s talking, what they believe, and how that shifts. It publishes once weekly volume rebuilds; for most players that’s in-season, when game-week chatter spikes.
Cohort divergence reads how different fanbases talk about this player. Returns once weekly mentions clear the publish floor.
Rival Radar
No rival-bucket mentions in the current season.
2025 Signature · 2025 season
13.8
yds
All FBS WRs, min 20 receptions
Why it matters
#173 of 531 All FBS WRs at 13.8 yards per reception (24 catches).
Vs cohort
MODERATE · n=24 cohort 531
Signature Moment
Week 7 vs East Carolina — 75 ypr
Result W 26-19
The week the volume broke through — put up 75 yds vs East Carolina.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the receiving totals stand
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
Zycarl Lewis Jr.'s story is about how role and output meet each other. For Tulane, the card already shows enough current-season production to explain why he is on the serious-player board, and the next layer is determining whether the profile is just very good or actually distinctive.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
Receiving weapon against FBS receiving peers.
2025 season snapshot | final
Receiving
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 13 games
| Wk | Opp | REC | YDS | AVG | TD | LONG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | W 23-3vs Northwestern | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 0 | 10 | |
| Wk 2 | W 33-31@ South Alabama | 2 | 24 | 12.0 | 0 | 20 | |
| Wk 3 | W 34-27vs Duke | 1 | 13 | 13.0 | 0 | 13 | |
| Wk 5 | W 31-14@ Tulsa | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 0 | 17 | |
| Wk 7 | W 26-19vs East Carolina | 2 | 75 | 37.5 | 1 | 63 | Season-high 75 yds |
| Wk 8 | W 24-17vs Army | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | 6 | |
| Wk 10 | L 26-48@ UTSA | 4 | 47 | 11.8 | 1 | 20 | |
| Wk 11 | W 38-32@ Memphis | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 0 | 22 | |
| Wk 12 | W 35-24vs Florida Atlantic | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | 2 | |
| Wk 13 | W 37-13@ Temple | 2 | 39 | 19.5 | 0 | 22 | |
| Wk 14 | W 27-0vs Charlotte | 2 | 22 | 11.0 | 0 | 21 | |
| Wk 15 | W 34-21vs North Texas | 2 | 30 | 15.0 | 0 | 17 | |
| Bowl | L 10-41@ Ole Miss | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 | 8 | |
| Total | 24 | 330 | 12.8 | 2 | 63 |
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
The player's share of a team's passing-game involvement. It is the fastest way to see whether the receiver is a true focal point or more of a complementary piece.
A blended workload view that accounts for catches, designed touches, and any return-game involvement that shapes the overall profile.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Receiving | Receptions | 24 | #358/1110 | 68th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving yards | 330 | #331/1107 | 70th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving TD | 2 | #281/1111 | 75th pct | Scoringvs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Yards / catch | 13.8 | #375/1106 | 66th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Pass share | 8.5% | #569/1137 | 50th pct | Air-game usagevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving LONG | 63 | #150/1105 | 87th pct | Metricvs FBS WR |
| Usage | 3rd-down usage | 7.1% | #442/1137 | 61st pct | Money-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Passing-down usage | 5.5% | #652/1137 | 43rd pct | Known-passing sharevs FBS WR |
| Usage | Role share | 3.9% | #625/1137 | 45th pct | Share of team offensevs FBS WR |
| Usage | 2nd-down usage | 3.2% | #771/1137 | 32nd pct | Middle-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Standard-down usage | 3.2% | #647/1137 | 43rd pct | Base-situation sharevs FBS WR |
| Usage | 1st-down usage | 3.0% | #715/1137 | 37th pct | Early-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Rush share | 0.0% | #391/1137 | 66th pct | Ground-game usagevs FBS WR |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION · Rung None of 16
Why he’s here
Standing classification populates when honors, Heisman, and roster signals all align.
What moves him up
What moves him down
Accolade streams
Heisman model tracks the top FBS contenders weekly; this player hasn't entered the watch list yet.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 13 games
Home vs Road
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home7g | 1.4 | 22.6 | 13.5 | 0.1 |
| Road6g | 2.3 | 28.7 | 12.0 | 0.2 |
Win vs Loss
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins11g | 1.7 | 25.0 | 13.3 | 0.1 |
| Losses2g | 2.5 | 27.5 | 9.9 | 0.5 |
First half vs Second half
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-76g | 1.5 | 24.5 | 14.8 | 0.2 |
| Weeks 8+7g | 2.1 | 26.1 | 11.1 | 0.1 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the WR cohort
Production sits in the middle of the position cohort across the board.
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Advanced Savant · WR · 2024
Advanced opponent-adjusted percentile bars are coming soon for this player.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
Reliable target who converts on critical downs. Not flashy; consistently productive.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Gio Richardson’s 2025 season.
Gio Richardson
Marcus Fleming
Amad Anderson
Takye Heath
Dashaun Davis
Matches Gio on
Differs from Gio on
Not enough data yet for this comparison.
As a sophomore, his production profile tracks closest to Marcus Fleming's sophomore season at Maryland (2021).
Marcus Fleming
Jamari Gassett
Takye Heath
Devonte Ross
Marcus Brown
Matches Marcus on
Differs from Marcus on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Jon Sumrall
Pass share
45.8%
424 pass / 501 run
Plays / game
66.1
14 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
3.4%
294 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Run-leaning.
Coaching Lineage · 2024–2025
1 coachPlayed his entire career under Jon Sumrall.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
All-America, all-conference, player-of-the-week, watch-list, and postseason awards land here when they're earned. The absence is the signal: most players never collect formal honors, and that's its own kind of context.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No formal honors on the ledger yet. All-America, all-conference, weekly awards, watch lists, and postseason trophies land here when they’re earned. | ||||
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
| Season | Team | Role | Latest Model | Forecast | Win | Finalist | Official Finish | Points | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Tulane | WR1 | #3573 | #3588 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W16 snapshot | American Athletic |
Team, conference, and class by season.