CFB Zeitgeist Score
67
Solid starter in the position cohort. Carried by pass tds at the 93rd percentile.
Ty Simpson
Ty Simpson is a cornerstone for Alabama — measured against the line he joined.
PASSING VALUE · WEPA
+0.44
via your WEPA model · 2025 · 501 plays
AI narrative · updated 2026-06-22 · compiled from CFB Zeitgeist data
Where He Ended Up · NFL
Los Angeles2026 NFL rookie season
QB · ALABAMA · SEC
CFB Zeitgeist Score
67
Solid starter in the position cohort. Carried by pass tds at the 93rd percentile.
Heisman Heat
#130
<1% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
<1%
TOP QB AWARD
Davey O'Brien
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 2 · StarterImpact starter. Producing measurable value above replacement.
“Alabama QB Ty Simpson will declare for the 2026 NFL Draft, a source confirmed to @theathletic.com. Simpson threw for 3,567 yards and 28 TDs with 5 INT for the Crimson Tide this season.”
Development Trajectory · passing yards
2022–2025Up 10091% from first season to most-recent.
Career Arc
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 5-star | 0.9883 | No. 26 recruit | HighSchool | Alabama |
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No transfer portal moves on file for this player. | ||
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Achievements
Selector Grid · 2025
Selector recognition fills in once the major honors lists (AP, FWAA, AFCA, Walter Camp, Sporting News, SI) are scraped and ingested.
NIL · Recruiting · NFL Draft
Market value, pedigree & pro outcome
Recruit stars
★★★★★
to Alabama
Composite
0.9883
#26 national
NFL Draft
2026 · Rd 1, Pick 13
#13 overall · Los Angeles
Today’s Hot-Take
5.6 td : int ratio — #4 in a 72-QB cohort, 96th percentile in the modern era.
Anti-Take
EFFICIENCYEfficiency rewards selectivity. Volume-adjusted rank in the same cohort almost always looks looser — call it elite, not unique.
Fan sentiment ·
Belief Meter
57
Mixed Sentiment
Top Take
“”
Trajectory
Rival Radar
2025 Signature · 2025 season
+0.440
EPA
P4 + Notre Dame QBs, min 250 dropbacks
Why it matters
#10 of 58 P4 + Notre Dame QBs by weighted EPA per dropback (min 250 dropbacks) — +0.440 EPA/play.
Vs cohort
HIGH · n=501 cohort 58
Signature Moment
Week 14 at Auburn — 31 ypc
Result W 27-20
The week the volume broke through — put up 31 yds at Auburn.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the passing totals stand
✓ Hit 3,000-yard season · finished with 3,567.
✓ Hit 25 passing TDs · finished with 28.
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
Ty Simpson's story is about how role and output meet each other. For Alabama, the card already shows enough current-season production to explain why he is on the serious-player board, and the next layer is determining whether the profile is just very good or actually distinctive.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
High-volume passer against FBS QB peers. The quickest read is whether the profile wins on volume, efficiency, explosiveness, or rushing value.
2025 season snapshot | final
Passing Efficiency
Passing Production
Rushing
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 15 games
| Wk | Opp | CMP/ATT | YDS | TD | INT | YPA | QBR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | L 17-31@ Florida State | 23/43 | 254 | 2 | 0 | 5.9 | 48.6 | Clean 2-TD game |
| Wk 2 | W 73-0vs UL Monroe | 17/17 | 226 | 3 | 0 | 13.3 | 99.3 | 3 TD passes |
| Wk 3 | W 38-14vs Wisconsin | 24/29 | 382 | 4 | 0 | 13.2 | 89.7 | Season-high 382 yds |
| Wk 5 | W 24-21@ Georgia | 24/38 | 276 | 2 | 0 | 7.3 | 90.1 | Clean 2-TD game |
| Wk 6 | W 30-14vs Vanderbilt | 23/31 | 340 | 2 | 1 | 11.0 | 80.1 | |
| Wk 7 | W 27-24@ Missouri | 23/31 | 200 | 3 | 0 | 6.5 | 77.6 | 3 TD passes |
| Wk 8 | W 37-20vs Tennessee | 19/29 | 253 | 2 | 0 | 8.7 | 89.0 | Clean 2-TD game |
| Wk 9 | W 29-22@ South Carolina | 24/43 | 253 | 2 | 0 | 5.9 | 77.9 | Clean 2-TD game |
| Wk 11 | W 20-9vs LSU | 21/35 | 277 | 1 | 0 | 7.9 | 79.6 | |
| Wk 12 | L 21-23vs Oklahoma | 28/42 | 326 | 1 | 1 | 7.8 | 64.4 | |
| Wk 13 | W 56-0vs Eastern Illinois | 11/16 | 147 | 0 | 2 | 9.2 | 47.1 | |
| Wk 14 | W 27-20@ Auburn | 19/35 | 122 | 3 | 0 | 3.5 | 76.3 | 3 TD passes |
| Wk 15 | L 7-28vs Georgia | 19/39 | 212 | 1 | 1 | 5.4 | 19.9 | |
| Bowl | W 34-24@ Oklahoma | 18/29 | 232 | 2 | 0 | 8.0 | 80.8 | |
| Bowl | L 3-38@ Indiana | 12/16 | 67 | 0 | 0 | 4.2 | 60.6 | |
| Total | 305/473 | 3567 | 28 | 5 | 7.9 | 72.1 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
Opponent-adjusted passing value. Positive numbers mean the quarterback is adding more value through the air than a neutral peer would in the same environment.
How much of the offense runs through the quarterback once passing and rushing responsibility are blended together.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passing | Passing yards | 3,567 | #11/382 | 97th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Pass TD | 28 | #12/407 | 97th pct | Scoringvs FBS QB |
| Passing | Completions | 305 | #8/383 | 98th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Completion % | 64.5% | #141/383 | 63rd pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Passing | Yards / attempt | 7.5 | #125/382 | 68th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rushing yards | 93 | #140/408 | 66th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Value | Passing WEPA | +0.44 | #14/200 | 94th pct | Opponent-adjusted passing value | 501 weighted playsvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Role share | 55.1% | #40/428 | 91st pct | Share of team offensevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Attempts | 473 | #7/407 | 99th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Interceptions | 5 | #276/407 | 32nd pct | Turnoversvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Carries | 90 | #63/408 | 85th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rushing LONG | 26 | #127/391 | 68th pct | Metricvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rush TD | 2 | #113/408 | 73rd pct | Scoringvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Yards / carry | 1.0 | #302/407 | 26th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Pass share | 89.1% | #69/428 | 84th pct | Air-game usagevs FBS QB |
| Usage | Passing-down usage | 74.0% | #19/428 | 96th pct | Known-passing sharevs FBS QB |
| Usage | 3rd-down usage | 72.7% | #27/428 | 94th pct | Money-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | 2nd-down usage | 54.6% | #48/428 | 89th pct | Middle-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Standard-down usage | 47.2% | #50/428 | 89th pct | Base-situation sharevs FBS QB |
| Usage | 1st-down usage | 45.9% | #65/428 | 85th pct | Early-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Rush share | 13.7% | #116/428 | 73rd pct | Ground-game usagevs FBS QB |
| Value | Rushing WEPA | +0.28 | #51/140 | 64th pct | Opponent-adjusted rushing value | 61 weighted playsvs FBS QB |
| Ball Security | Fumbles lost | 6 | #258/258 | 0th pct | Turnoversvs FBS QB |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION · Rung None of 16
Why he’s here
Standing classification populates when honors, Heisman, and roster signals all align.
What moves him up
What moves him down
Accolade streams
Heisman model tracks the top FBS contenders weekly; this player hasn't entered the watch list yet.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 15 games
Home vs Road
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home8g | 270 | 1.8 | 9.6 | 0.6 |
| Road7g | 201 | 2.0 | 5.9 | 0.0 |
Win vs Loss
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins11g | 246 | 2.2 | 8.6 | 0.3 |
| Losses4g | 215 | 1.0 | 5.8 | 0.5 |
First half vs Second half
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-78g | 247 | 2.2 | 8.7 | 0.1 |
| Weeks 8+7g | 227 | 1.4 | 6.9 | 0.6 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the QB cohort
Elite: pass yards (94th). Strength: pass tds (92nd). Concern: fumbles lost (0th).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Pass Profile · Completion depth (PBP)
Where the throws are landing
Short
0–9 ydsMiddle
10–19 ydsDeep
20+ ydsOverall 66.5% completion on 251 attempts · 32 deep completions averaging 30.1 yds.
Advanced Savant · QB · 2024
Elite: EPA / dropback.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
High-percentage passer who protects the ball. Loses the matchup on improvisation.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Shane Buechele’s 2020 season.
Shane Buechele
Luke Altmyer
Brennan Armstrong
Tyler Johnston III
Kenny Pickett
Matches Shane on
Differs from Shane on
Through 2 college seasons, his career arc tracks closest to Bailey Zappe’s path through Western Kentucky.
Bailey Zappe
Eli Peters
Quinn Ewers
Feleipe Franks
Kyle McCord
Matches Bailey on
As a senior, his production profile tracks closest to Brady Cook's senior season at Missouri (2023).
Brady Cook
Spencer Rattler
Jordan Travis
Luke Altmyer
Graham Mertz
Matches Brady on
Differs from Brady on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Kalen DeBoer
Pass share
53.4%
523 pass / 456 run
Plays / game
65.3
15 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
6.8%
384 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Balanced.
Coaching Lineage · 2022–2025
2 coachesCoaching transition mid-career: Nick Saban → Kalen DeBoer. Worth noting in scheme + development context.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
All-America, all-conference, player-of-the-week, watch-list, and postseason awards land here when they're earned. The absence is the signal: most players never collect formal honors, and that's its own kind of context.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No formal honors on the ledger yet. All-America, all-conference, weekly awards, watch lists, and postseason trophies land here when they’re earned. | ||||
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
Team, conference, and class by season.