CFB Zeitgeist Score
48
Mid-pack in the position cohort. Carried by rec tds at the 66th percentile.
Nate Boerkircher
Below the discourse floor — the honest stats-only state.
204 REC YDS · 20 REC · 3 REC TD
Where He Ended Up · NFL
Jacksonville2026 NFL rookie season
TE · TEXAS A&M · SEC
CFB Zeitgeist Score
48
Mid-pack in the position cohort. Carried by rec tds at the 66th percentile.
Heisman Heat
#907
<1% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
<1%
TOP TE AWARD
Mackey
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 2 · StarterImpact starter. Producing measurable value above replacement.
Development Trajectory · receiving yards
2021–2025Up 1357% from first season to most-recent.
Career Arc
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No recruiting profile is on file for this player. | ||
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No transfer portal moves on file for this player. | ||
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Selector Grid · 2025
Selector recognition fills in once the major honors lists (AP, FWAA, AFCA, Walter Camp, Sporting News, SI) are scraped and ingested.
NIL · Recruiting · NFL Draft
Market value, pedigree & pro outcome
NFL Draft
2026 · Rd 2, Pick 24
#56 overall · Jacksonville
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment · Awaiting signal
The Room reads fan conversation around a player — who’s talking, what they believe, and how that shifts. It publishes once weekly volume rebuilds; for most players that’s in-season, when game-week chatter spikes.
Cohort divergence reads how different fanbases talk about this player. Returns once weekly mentions clear the publish floor.
Rival Radar
No rival-bucket mentions in the current season.
2025 Signature · 2025 season
3
count
All FBS WRs, min 20 receptions
Why it matters
#222 of 531 All FBS WRs in receiving TDs — 3 TDs on 20 receptions.
Vs cohort
MODERATE · n=20 cohort 531
Signature Moment
Week 3 at Notre Dame — 1 receiving_tds
Result W 41-40
The week the volume broke through — stacked 1 td at Notre Dame.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the receiving totals stand
To hit 700-yard receiver (currently 204): needs 248/game over remaining 2.
To hit 1,000-yard receiver (currently 204): needs 398/game over remaining 2.
To hit 60-catch season (currently 20): needs 20/game over remaining 2.
To hit 80-catch season (currently 20): needs 30/game over remaining 2.
To hit 8 receiving TDs (currently 3): needs 2.5/game over remaining 2.
To hit 10 receiving TDs (currently 3): needs 3.5/game over remaining 2.
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
The most interesting thing about Nate Boerkircher is that he shows up in multiple game states. He is a receiver first, but the profile also includes designed touches and return-game juice, which means his value is not limited to a conventional route tree.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
Receiving weapon against FBS receiving peers.
2025 season snapshot | final
Receiving
Rushing
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 11 games
| Wk | Opp | REC | YDS | AVG | TD | LONG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | W 42-24vs UTSA | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 0 | 13 | |
| Wk 3 | W 41-40@ Notre Dame | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 1 | 11 | |
| Wk 5 | W 16-10vs Auburn | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | 9 | |
| Wk 6 | W 31-9vs Mississippi State | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | 7 | |
| Wk 7 | W 34-17vs Florida | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 0 | 28 | |
| Wk 8 | W 45-42@ Arkansas | 4 | 29 | 7.3 | 1 | 12 | |
| Wk 9 | W 49-25@ LSU | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Wk 11 | W 38-17@ Missouri | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 0 | 11 | |
| Wk 12 | W 31-30vs South Carolina | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 1 | 19 | Season-high 40 yds |
| Wk 14 | L 17-27@ Texas | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 | 8 | |
| Bowl | L 3-10vs Miami | 2 | 33 | 16.5 | 0 | 19 | |
| Total | 20 | 204 | 10.0 | 3 | 28 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
The tight end's share of the passing offense, which helps distinguish a featured receiving tight end from a secondary option.
A blended usage view that shows how often the offense flows through the tight end compared with other same-level peers.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Receiving | Receptions | 20 | #102/475 | 79th pct | Volumevs FBS TE |
| Receiving | Receiving yards | 204 | #109/475 | 77th pct | Volumevs FBS TE |
| Receiving | Receiving TD | 3 | #45/475 | 91st pct | Scoringvs FBS TE |
| Receiving | Yards / catch | 10.2 | #212/475 | 56th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS TE |
| Usage | Pass share | 6.8% | #187/468 | 60th pct | Air-game usagevs FBS TE |
| Rushing | Rushing yards | 5 | #27/53 | 51st pct | Volumevs FBS TE |
| Rushing | Carries | 3 | #13/59 | 80th pct | Volumevs FBS TE |
| Rushing | Rushing LONG | 3 | #27/50 | 48th pct | Metricvs FBS TE |
| Rushing | Yards / carry | 1.7 | #31/53 | 43rd pct | Efficiencyvs FBS TE |
| Rushing | Rush TD | 1 | #5/62 | 94th pct | Scoringvs FBS TE |
| Receiving | Receiving LONG | 28 | #149/475 | 69th pct | Metricvs FBS TE |
| Usage | 3rd-down usage | 4.1% | #185/468 | 61st pct | Money-down loadvs FBS TE |
| Usage | Passing-down usage | 4.0% | #199/468 | 58th pct | Known-passing sharevs FBS TE |
| Usage | 1st-down usage | 3.5% | #170/468 | 64th pct | Early-down loadvs FBS TE |
| Usage | Role share | 3.5% | #175/468 | 63rd pct | Share of team offensevs FBS TE |
| Usage | Standard-down usage | 3.3% | #184/468 | 61st pct | Base-situation sharevs FBS TE |
| Usage | 2nd-down usage | 2.9% | #268/468 | 43rd pct | Middle-down loadvs FBS TE |
| Usage | Rush share | 0.8% | #21/468 | 96th pct | Ground-game usagevs FBS TE |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION · Rung None of 16
Why he’s here
Standing classification populates when honors, Heisman, and roster signals all align.
What moves him up
What moves him down
Accolade streams
The Mackey award tracker integrates per-week probability once a dedicated scraper for this award lands. Confirmed past winners and finalists for this player will surface here.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 11 games
Home vs Road
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home6g | 2.0 | 23.5 | 11.0 | 0.2 |
| Road5g | 1.6 | 12.6 | 8.4 | 0.4 |
Win vs Loss
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins9g | 1.9 | 18.1 | 9.4 | 0.3 |
| Losses2g | 1.5 | 20.5 | 12.2 | 0.0 |
First half vs Second half
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-76g | 1.7 | 18.7 | 10.6 | 0.2 |
| Weeks 8+5g | 2.0 | 18.4 | 9.0 | 0.4 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the TE cohort
Production sits in the middle of the position cohort across the board.
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Advanced Savant · TE · 2024
Advanced opponent-adjusted percentile bars are coming soon for this player.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
Dual-threat: blocks when needed, catches when needed. Coveted on both sides.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Dallas Payne’s 2025 season.
Dallas Payne
Neal Johnson
Chamon Metayer
Jake Roberts
Elijah Sohn
Matches Dallas on
Not enough data yet for this comparison.
As a graduate, his production profile tracks closest to Joe Royer's graduate season at Cincinnati (2025).
Joe Royer
Lake McRee
Chase Curtis
Tanner Arkin
Keanu Hill
Matches Joe on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Mike Elko
Pass share
45.8%
407 pass / 482 run
Plays / game
68.4
13 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
3.8%
286 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Run-leaning.
Coaching Lineage · 2021–2025
3 coachesPlayed under 3 different head coaches: Jimbo Fisher, Elijah Robinson, and Mike Elko. Multi-era developmental context.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
All-America, all-conference, player-of-the-week, watch-list, and postseason awards land here when they're earned. The absence is the signal: most players never collect formal honors, and that's its own kind of context.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No formal honors on the ledger yet. All-America, all-conference, weekly awards, watch lists, and postseason trophies land here when they’re earned. | ||||
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
| Season | Team | Role | Latest Model | Forecast | Win | Finalist | Official Finish | Points | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Nebraska | TE4 | #907 | #891 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W16 snapshot | Big Ten |
| 2023 | Nebraska | TE4 | #2513 | #2734 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W19 snapshot | Big Ten |
| 2022 | Nebraska | TE4 | #2613 | #2961 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W20 snapshot | Big Ten |
| 2021 | Nebraska | TE4 | #3116 | #3177 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W20 snapshot | Big Ten |
Team, conference, and class by season.
| Season | Team | Conference | Pos | Class | Bio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Texas A&M | SEC | TE | 4 | No. 87 | 6-4 | 250 lb | Aurora, NE |
| 2024 | Nebraska | Big Ten | TE | 4 | No. 87 | 6-4 | 250 lb | Aurora, NE |
| 2023 | Nebraska | Big Ten | TE | 4 | No. 87 | 6-4 | 250 lb | Aurora, NE |
| 2022 | Nebraska | Big Ten | TE | 4 | No. 87 | 6-4 | 250 lb | Aurora, NE |
| 2021 | Nebraska | Big Ten | TE | 4 | No. 87 | 6-4 | 250 lb | Aurora, NE |