CFB Zeitgeist Score
56
Solid starter in the position cohort. Carried by rec tds at the 66th percentile.
Mason Williams
Below the discourse floor — the honest stats-only state.
285 REC YDS · 27 REC · 3 REC TD
2026 Outlook
Returning to Ohio for 2026
2026 Depth chart
Projected starter
Tight end · Ohio
Returning around him
2026 Award watch
No preseason watch lists yet (most drop June 15 – July 15)
Ohio · Last season: 9-4 · Talent rank #126 · 2026 recruiting class #121
TE · OHIO · MID-AMERICAN
CFB Zeitgeist Score
56
Solid starter in the position cohort. Carried by rec tds at the 66th percentile.
Heisman Heat
#1094
<1% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
<1%
TOP TE AWARD
Mackey
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 2 · StarterImpact starter. Producing measurable value above replacement.
Development Trajectory · receiving yards
2023–2025Up 265% from first season to most-recent.
Career Arc
Heisman futures · live sportsbook odds
#21 in market ▼ from #18 · 6 books
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No recruiting profile is on file for this player. | ||
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No transfer portal moves on file for this player. | ||
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Selector Grid · 2025
Selector recognition fills in once the major honors lists (AP, FWAA, AFCA, Walter Camp, Sporting News, SI) are scraped and ingested.
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment ·
Belief Meter
71
Grounded Optimism
Top Take
“”
Trajectory
Rival Radar
2025 Signature · 2025 season
3
count
All FBS WRs, min 20 receptions
Why it matters
#222 of 531 All FBS WRs in receiving TDs — 3 TDs on 27 receptions.
Vs cohort
MODERATE · n=27 cohort 531
Signature Moment
Week 1 at Rutgers — 1 receiving_tds
Result L 31-34
The week the volume broke through — stacked 1 td at Rutgers.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the receiving totals stand
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
Mason Williams's story is about how role and output meet each other. For Ohio, the card already shows enough current-season production to explain why he is on the serious-player board, and the next layer is determining whether the profile is just very good or actually distinctive.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
Target magnet against FBS receiving peers.
2025 season snapshot | final
Receiving
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 13 games
| Wk | Opp | REC | YDS | AVG | TD | LONG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | L 31-34@ Rutgers | 2 | 10 | 5.0 | 1 | 6 | |
| Wk 2 | W 17-10vs West Virginia | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 0 | 13 | |
| Wk 3 | L 9-37@ Ohio State | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | 3 | |
| Wk 4 | W 52-35vs Gardner-Webb | 1 | 17 | 17.0 | 0 | 17 | |
| Wk 5 | W 35-20vs Bowling Green | 8 | 93 | 11.6 | 1 | 19 | Season-high 93 yds |
| Wk 6 | L 14-20@ Ball State | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | 4 | |
| Wk 8 | W 48-21vs Northern Illinois | 1 | 23 | 23.0 | 0 | 23 | |
| Wk 9 | W 28-21@ Eastern Michigan | 3 | 45 | 15.0 | 0 | 30 | |
| Wk 11 | W 24-20vs Miami (OH) | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 0 | 15 | |
| Wk 12 | L 13-17@ Western Michigan | 2 | 20 | 10.0 | 0 | 11 | |
| Wk 13 | W 42-14vs Massachusetts | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 0 | 11 | |
| Wk 14 | W 31-26@ Buffalo | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 1 | 11 | |
| Bowl | W 17-10vs UNLV | 2 | 12 | 6.0 | 0 | 9 | |
| Total | 27 | 285 | 10.4 | 3 | 30 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
The tight end's share of the passing offense, which helps distinguish a featured receiving tight end from a secondary option.
A blended usage view that shows how often the offense flows through the tight end compared with other same-level peers.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Receiving | Receptions | 27 | #66/475 | 86th pct | Volumevs FBS TE |
| Receiving | Receiving yards | 285 | #77/475 | 84th pct | Volumevs FBS TE |
| Receiving | Receiving TD | 3 | #45/475 | 91st pct | Scoringvs FBS TE |
| Receiving | Yards / catch | 10.6 | #190/475 | 60th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS TE |
| Usage | Pass share | 9.7% | #97/468 | 79th pct | Air-game usagevs FBS TE |
| Receiving | Receiving LONG | 30 | #134/475 | 72nd pct | Metricvs FBS TE |
| Usage | 2nd-down usage | 5.2% | #105/468 | 78th pct | Middle-down loadvs FBS TE |
| Usage | Standard-down usage | 4.0% | #120/468 | 75th pct | Base-situation sharevs FBS TE |
| Usage | Role share | 3.6% | #159/468 | 66th pct | Share of team offensevs FBS TE |
| Usage | 1st-down usage | 2.8% | #247/468 | 47th pct | Early-down loadvs FBS TE |
| Usage | 3rd-down usage | 2.6% | #263/468 | 44th pct | Money-down loadvs FBS TE |
| Usage | Passing-down usage | 2.6% | #293/468 | 38th pct | Known-passing sharevs FBS TE |
| Usage | Rush share | 0.0% | #58/468 | 88th pct | Ground-game usagevs FBS TE |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION · Rung None of 16
Why he’s here
Standing classification populates when honors, Heisman, and roster signals all align.
What moves him up
What moves him down
Accolade streams
The Mackey award tracker integrates per-week probability once a dedicated scraper for this award lands. Confirmed past winners and finalists for this player will surface here.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 13 games
Home vs Road
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home7g | 2.4 | 27.4 | 12.4 | 0.1 |
| Road6g | 1.7 | 15.5 | 8.0 | 0.3 |
Win vs Loss
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins9g | 2.3 | 27.6 | 12.5 | 0.2 |
| Losses4g | 1.5 | 9.2 | 5.5 | 0.2 |
First half vs Second half
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-77g | 2.4 | 21.7 | 7.6 | 0.3 |
| Weeks 8+6g | 1.7 | 22.2 | 13.6 | 0.2 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the TE cohort
Production sits in the middle of the position cohort across the board.
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Advanced Savant · TE · 2024
Advanced opponent-adjusted percentile bars are coming soon for this player.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
Dual-threat: blocks when needed, catches when needed. Coveted on both sides.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Jaden Platt’s 2025 season.
Jaden Platt
Michael Masunas
Miles Kitselman
C.J. Dippre
Jeremy Ruckert
Matches Jaden on
Differs from Jaden on
Not enough data yet for this comparison.
As a junior, his production profile tracks closest to Jaden Platt's junior season at Arkansas (2025).
Jaden Platt
Ethan Davis
Michael Masunas
Tristian Brank
Blake Whiteheart
Matches Jaden on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Brian Smith
Pass share
36.6%
311 pass / 539 run
Plays / game
65.4
13 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
9.4%
278 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Run-heavy.
Coaching Lineage · 2023–2025
2 coachesCoaching transition mid-career: Tim Albin → Brian Smith. Worth noting in scheme + development context.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
All-America, all-conference, player-of-the-week, watch-list, and postseason awards land here when they're earned. The absence is the signal: most players never collect formal honors, and that's its own kind of context.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No formal honors on the ledger yet. All-America, all-conference, weekly awards, watch lists, and postseason trophies land here when they’re earned. | ||||
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
Team, conference, and class by season.