CFB Zeitgeist Score
57
Solid starter in the position cohort. Carried by rec yards at the 97th percentile.
Lewis Bond
Below the discourse floor — the honest stats-only state.
1,010 REC YDS · 89 REC · 1 REC TD
Where He Ended Up · NFL
Houston2026 NFL rookie season
WR · BOSTON COLLEGE · ACC
CFB Zeitgeist Score
57
Solid starter in the position cohort. Carried by rec yards at the 97th percentile.
Heisman Heat
#2553
<1% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
<1%
TOP WR AWARD
Biletnikoff
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 2 · StarterImpact starter. Producing measurable value above replacement.
Development Trajectory · receiving yards
2021–2025Up 16733% from first season to most-recent.
Career Arc
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 3-star | 0.8511 | No. 1157 recruit | HighSchool |
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No transfer portal moves on file for this player. | ||
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Achievements
Selector Grid · 2025
Selector recognition fills in once the major honors lists (AP, FWAA, AFCA, Walter Camp, Sporting News, SI) are scraped and ingested.
NIL · Recruiting · NFL Draft
Market value, pedigree & pro outcome
Recruit stars
★★★☆☆
to —
Composite
0.8511
#1157 national
NFL Draft
2026 · Rd 6, Pick 23
#204 overall · Houston
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment ·
Belief Meter
—
Awaiting per-cohort signal
Top Take
“”
Trajectory
Rival Radar
No rival-bucket mentions in the current season.
2025 Signature · 2025 season
1,010
yds
All FBS WRs, min 20 receptions
Why it matters
#19 of 531 All FBS WRs in receiving yards — 1,010 yards on 89 receptions.
Vs cohort
HIGH · n=89 cohort 531
Signature Moment
Week 14 at Syracuse — 171 receiving_yards_total
Result W 34-12
The week the volume broke through — put up 171 yds at Syracuse.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the receiving totals stand
✓ Hit 700-yard receiver · finished with 1,010.
✓ Hit 1,000-yard receiver · finished with 1,010.
✓ Hit 60-catch season · finished with 89.
✓ Hit 80-catch season · finished with 89.
To hit 8 receiving TDs (currently 1): needs 7/game over remaining 1.
To hit 10 receiving TDs (currently 1): needs 9/game over remaining 1.
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
Lewis Bond's story is about how role and output meet each other. For Boston College, the card already shows enough current-season production to explain why he is on the serious-player board, and the next layer is determining whether the profile is just very good or actually distinctive.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
Target magnet against FBS receiving peers.
2025 season snapshot | final
Receiving
Rushing
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 12 games
| Wk | Opp | REC | YDS | AVG | TD | LONG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | W 66-10vs Fordham | 11 | 138 | 12.5 | 0 | 32 | 138-yard receiving day |
| Wk 2 | L 40-42@ Michigan State | 11 | 90 | 8.2 | 0 | 19 | |
| Wk 3 | L 20-30@ Stanford | 7 | 47 | 6.7 | 0 | 11 | |
| Wk 5 | L 24-28vs California | 7 | 77 | 11.0 | 0 | 16 | |
| Wk 6 | L 7-48@ Pittsburgh | 2 | 14 | 7.0 | 0 | 9 | |
| Wk 7 | L 10-41vs Clemson | 7 | 70 | 10.0 | 0 | 17 | |
| Wk 8 | L 23-38vs UConn | 5 | 69 | 13.8 | 0 | 27 | |
| Wk 9 | L 24-38@ Louisville | 6 | 42 | 7.0 | 1 | 10 | |
| Wk 10 | L 10-25vs Notre Dame | 8 | 92 | 11.5 | 0 | 22 | |
| Wk 11 | L 13-45vs SMU | 9 | 94 | 10.4 | 0 | 22 | |
| Wk 12 | L 34-36vs Georgia Tech | 8 | 106 | 13.3 | 0 | 32 | |
| Wk 14 | W 34-12@ Syracuse | 8 | 171 | 21.4 | 0 | 54 | Season-high 171 yds |
| Total | 89 | 1010 | 11.1 | 1 | 54 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
| Season | Team | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Boston College | 89 | 1,010 | 11.3 | 1 | -- |
| 2023 | Boston College | 52 | 646 | 12.4 | 7 | -- |
| 2022 | Boston College | 5 | 51 | 10.2 | 0 | -- |
| 2021 | Boston College | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | -- |
| Career | 4 loaded seasons | 147 | 1,713 | 11.7 | 8 | -- |
| Season | Team | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Boston College | 4 | 3 | -- | -- | -- |
| 2023 | Boston College | 1 | 2 | 72 | 67 | -- |
| 2022 | Boston College | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| 2021 | Boston College | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Career | 4 loaded seasons | 5 | 5 | 72 | 67 | -- |
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
The player's share of a team's passing-game involvement. It is the fastest way to see whether the receiver is a true focal point or more of a complementary piece.
A blended workload view that accounts for catches, designed touches, and any return-game involvement that shapes the overall profile.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Receiving | Receptions | 89 | #5/1110 | 100th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving yards | 1,010 | #20/1107 | 98th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving TD | 1 | #396/1111 | 64th pct | Scoringvs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Yards / catch | 11.3 | #609/1106 | 45th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Pass share | 23.5% | #38/1137 | 97th pct | Air-game usagevs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Rushing LONG | 7 | #212/346 | 39th pct | Metricvs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Carries | 4 | #108/407 | 74th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Rushing yards | 3 | #293/397 | 26th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Yards / carry | 0.8 | #320/393 | 19th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Rush TD | 0 | #81/411 | 81st pct | Scoringvs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving LONG | 54 | #228/1105 | 79th pct | Metricvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Passing-down usage | 21.8% | #9/1137 | 99th pct | Known-passing sharevs FBS WR |
| Usage | 3rd-down usage | 19.9% | #9/1137 | 99th pct | Money-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Role share | 14.3% | #15/1137 | 99th pct | Share of team offensevs FBS WR |
| Usage | 2nd-down usage | 13.0% | #35/1137 | 97th pct | Middle-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | 1st-down usage | 12.4% | #35/1137 | 97th pct | Early-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Standard-down usage | 11.1% | #45/1137 | 96th pct | Base-situation sharevs FBS WR |
| Usage | Rush share | 1.9% | #108/1137 | 91st pct | Ground-game usagevs FBS WR |
| Ball Security | Fumbles lost | 1 | #131/302 | 57th pct | Turnoversvs FBS WR |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION · Rung None of 16
Why he’s here
Standing classification populates when honors, Heisman, and roster signals all align.
What moves him up
What moves him down
Accolade streams
Heisman model tracks the top FBS contenders weekly; this player hasn't entered the watch list yet.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 12 games
Home vs Road
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home7g | 7.9 | 92.3 | 11.8 | 0.0 |
| Road5g | 6.8 | 72.8 | 10.1 | 0.2 |
Win vs Loss
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins2g | 9.5 | 154 | 16.9 | 0.0 |
| Losses10g | 7.0 | 70.1 | 9.9 | 0.1 |
First half vs Second half
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-76g | 7.5 | 72.7 | 9.2 | 0.0 |
| Weeks 8+6g | 7.3 | 95.7 | 12.9 | 0.2 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the WR cohort
Elite: receptions (99th). Strength: rec yards (96th). Concern: rec tds (23rd).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Advanced Savant · WR · 2024
Advanced opponent-adjusted percentile bars are coming soon for this player.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
Runs precise routes in tight quarters. Volume player who keeps chains moving.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Hank Beatty’s 2025 season.
Hank Beatty
Jarrin Pierce
Sean Atkins
Xavier Restrepo
Demarcus Lacey
Matches Hank on
Differs from Hank on
Through 3 college seasons, his career arc tracks closest to Antwan Davis’s path through Ball State.
Antwan Davis
Neno Lemay
Kobe Drake
DeAree Rogers
Max Tomczak
Matches Antwan on
As a graduate, his production profile tracks closest to Daniel Jackson's graduate season at Minnesota (2024).
Daniel Jackson
Keelan Marion
Giles Jackson
A.J. Henning
Tez Johnson
Matches Daniel on
Differs from Daniel on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Bill O'Brien
Pass share
54.8%
454 pass / 374 run
Plays / game
69.0
12 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
10.9%
349 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Balanced.
Coaching Lineage · 2021–2025
2 coachesCoaching transition mid-career: Jeff Hafley → Bill O'Brien. Worth noting in scheme + development context.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
All-America, all-conference, player-of-the-week, watch-list, and postseason awards land here when they're earned. The absence is the signal: most players never collect formal honors, and that's its own kind of context.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No formal honors on the ledger yet. All-America, all-conference, weekly awards, watch lists, and postseason trophies land here when they’re earned. | ||||
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
| Season | Team | Role | Latest Model | Forecast | Win | Finalist | Official Finish | Points | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Boston College | WR4 | #2553 | #2368 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W16 snapshot | ACC |
| 2023 | Boston College | WR4 | #614 | #838 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W19 snapshot | ACC |
| 2022 | Boston College | WR4 | #3302 | #3711 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W20 snapshot | ACC |
| 2021 | Boston College | WR4 | #2896 | #2722 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W20 snapshot | ACC |
Team, conference, and class by season.
| Season | Team | Conference | Pos | Class | Bio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Boston College | ACC | WR | 4 | No. 11 | 5-11 | 190 lb | Chicago, IL |
| 2024 | Boston College | ACC | WR | 4 | No. 11 | 5-11 | 190 lb | Chicago, IL |
| 2023 | Boston College | ACC | WR | 4 | No. 11 | 5-11 | 190 lb | Chicago, IL |
| 2022 | Boston College | ACC | WR | 4 | No. 11 | 5-11 | 190 lb | Chicago, IL |
| 2021 | Boston College | ACC | WR | 4 | No. 11 | 5-11 | 190 lb | Chicago, IL |