CFB Zeitgeist Score
64
Solid starter in the position cohort. Carried by yards / att at the 78th percentile.
Kevin Jennings
Below the discourse floor — the honest stats-only state.
3,641 PASS YDS · 26 PASS TD · 54 RUSH YDS
2026 Outlook
Returning to SMU for 2026
2026 Depth chart
Projected starter
Quarterback · SMU
Returning around him
2026 Award watch
No preseason watch lists yet (most drop June 15 – July 15)
SMU · Last season: 9-4 (AP #25) · Talent rank #25 · 2026 recruiting class #31
QB · SMU · ACC
CFB Zeitgeist Score
64
Solid starter in the position cohort. Carried by yards / att at the 78th percentile.
Heisman Heat
#4
5.3% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
5.3%
TOP QB AWARD
Davey O'Brien
In contention
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 5 · ApexPosition-of-the-Year finalist. Among the nation's elite at the position.
Career arc · Season-by-season Standing
4 seasons on the ladder
2022
SMU · QB
—
2023
SMU · QB
—
2024
SMU · QB
R15 · POTY finalist
Apex
2025
SMU · QB
—
Development Trajectory · passing yards
2022–2025Up 1676% from first season to most-recent.
Career Arc
Heisman futures · live sportsbook odds
#28 in market ▼ from #22 · 6 books
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 3-star | 0.8378 | No. 1535 recruit | HighSchool | SMU |
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No transfer portal moves on file for this player. | ||
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Achievements
Selector Grid · 2025
Selector recognition fills in once the major honors lists (AP, FWAA, AFCA, Walter Camp, Sporting News, SI) are scraped and ingested.
NIL · Recruiting · NFL Draft
Market value, pedigree & pro outcome
NIL Valuation · On3
$902K
On3 ranking · Jun 2026
Whisper Rate
$3.00M
per-deal market estimate
Recruit stars
★★★☆☆
to SMU
Composite
0.8378
#1535 national
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment ·
Belief Meter
50
Mixed Sentiment
Top Take
“”
Trajectory
Rival Radar
Only 2 rival mention(s) — below the 4-mention floor for a defensible read.
2025 Signature · 2025 season
+0.430
EPA
P4 + Notre Dame QBs, min 250 dropbacks
Why it matters
#14 of 58 P4 + Notre Dame QBs by weighted EPA per dropback (min 250 dropbacks) — +0.430 EPA/play.
Vs cohort
HIGH · n=428 cohort 58
Signature Moment
No signature moment on the ledger yet.
Returns once this player puts together a multi-game body of work — single-game flashes alone don't clear the bar.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the passing totals stand
✓ Hit 3,000-yard season · finished with 3,641.
✓ Hit 25 passing TDs · finished with 26.
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
Kevin Jennings's story is about how role and output meet each other. For SMU, the card already shows enough current-season production to explain why he is on the serious-player board, and the next layer is determining whether the profile is just very good or actually distinctive.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
High-volume passer | Efficient against FBS QB peers. The quickest read is whether the profile wins on volume, efficiency, explosiveness, or rushing value.
2025 season snapshot | final
Passing Efficiency
Passing Production
Rushing
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 13 games
| Wk | Opp | CMP/ATT | YDS | TD | INT | YPA | QBR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | W 42-13vs East Texas A&M | 22/30 | 260 | 2 | 1 | 8.7 | 26.1 | 3 INTs — rough day |
| Wk 2 | L 45-48vs Baylor | 16/22 | 295 | 3 | 1 | 13.4 | 50.1 | 3 TD passes |
| Wk 3 | W 28-10@ Missouri State | 24/36 | 281 | 1 | 1 | 7.8 | 62.7 | |
| Wk 4 | L 24-35@ TCU | 24/38 | 290 | 3 | 2 | 7.6 | 76.8 | 3 TD passes |
| Wk 6 | W 31-18vs Syracuse | 29/35 | 285 | 4 | 1 | 8.1 | 86.0 | 4 TD passes |
| Wk 7 | W 34-10vs Stanford | 22/30 | 247 | 2 | 0 | 8.2 | 76.6 | |
| Wk 8 | W 35-24@ Clemson | 23/43 | 290 | 2 | 1 | 6.7 | 69.1 | |
| Wk 9 | L 12-13@ Wake Forest | 21/39 | 171 | 0 | 1 | 4.4 | 40.7 | |
| Wk 10 | W 26-20vs Miami | 29/44 | 365 | 1 | 0 | 8.3 | 67.6 | Season-high 365 yds |
| Wk 11 | W 45-13@ Boston College | 16/32 | 326 | 3 | 1 | 10.2 | 49.8 | 3 TD passes |
| Wk 13 | W 38-6vs Louisville | 29/37 | 303 | 3 | 0 | 8.2 | 93.9 | 3 TD passes |
| Wk 14 | L 35-38@ California | 24/36 | 250 | 2 | 1 | 6.9 | 75.4 | |
| Bowl | W 24-19vs Arizona | 21/32 | 278 | 0 | 3 | 8.7 | — | |
| Total | 300/454 | 3641 | 26 | 13 | 8.2 | 64.6 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
Opponent-adjusted passing value. Positive numbers mean the quarterback is adding more value through the air than a neutral peer would in the same environment.
How much of the offense runs through the quarterback once passing and rushing responsibility are blended together.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passing | Passing yards | 3,641 | #9/382 | 98th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Pass TD | 26 | #16/407 | 96th pct | Scoringvs FBS QB |
| Passing | Completions | 300 | #11/383 | 97th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Completion % | 66.1% | #114/383 | 70th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Passing | Yards / attempt | 8.0 | #92/382 | 76th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rushing yards | 54 | #182/408 | 56th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Value | Passing WEPA | +0.43 | #19/200 | 91st pct | Opponent-adjusted passing value | 428 weighted playsvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Role share | 57.7% | #23/428 | 95th pct | Share of team offensevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Attempts | 454 | #11/407 | 98th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Interceptions | 13 | #404/407 | 1st pct | Turnoversvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Carries | 70 | #90/408 | 78th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rushing LONG | 26 | #127/391 | 68th pct | Metricvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rush TD | 4 | #74/408 | 82nd pct | Scoringvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Yards / carry | 0.8 | #313/407 | 23rd pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Pass share | 95.3% | #22/428 | 95th pct | Air-game usagevs FBS QB |
| Usage | Passing-down usage | 77.7% | #11/428 | 98th pct | Known-passing sharevs FBS QB |
| Usage | 3rd-down usage | 72.3% | #29/428 | 93rd pct | Money-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | 2nd-down usage | 56.7% | #34/428 | 92nd pct | Middle-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | 1st-down usage | 52.7% | #17/428 | 96th pct | Early-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Standard-down usage | 49.1% | #39/428 | 91st pct | Base-situation sharevs FBS QB |
| Usage | Rush share | 13.1% | #124/428 | 71st pct | Ground-game usagevs FBS QB |
| Value | Rushing WEPA | +0.09 | #129/140 | 9th pct | Opponent-adjusted rushing value | 43 weighted playsvs FBS QB |
| Ball Security | Fumbles lost | 3 | #213/258 | 18th pct | Turnoversvs FBS QB |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION · Rung None of 16
Why he’s here
Standing classification populates when honors, Heisman, and roster signals all align.
What moves him up
What moves him down
Accolade streams
Heisman model tracks the top FBS contenders weekly; this player hasn't entered the watch list yet.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 13 games
Home vs Road
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home7g | 290 | 2.1 | 9.1 | 0.9 |
| Road6g | 268 | 1.8 | 7.3 | 1.2 |
Win vs Loss
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins9g | 293 | 2.0 | 8.3 | 0.9 |
| Losses4g | 252 | 2.0 | 8.1 | 1.2 |
First half vs Second half
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-77g | 277 | 2.1 | 8.9 | 1.3 |
| Weeks 8+6g | 284 | 1.8 | 7.5 | 0.7 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the QB cohort
Elite: pass yards (95th). Strength: pass tds (90th). Concern: interceptions (1st).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Pass Profile · Completion depth (PBP)
Where the throws are landing
Short
0–9 ydsMiddle
10–19 ydsDeep
20+ ydsOverall 67.1% completion on 225 attempts · 25 deep completions averaging 31.6 yds.
Advanced Savant · QB · 2024
Elite: EPA / dropback.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
Balanced passer who operates within the system. Profile sits near league average across dimensions.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Jake Haener’s 2021 season.
Jake Haener
Jayden de Laura
Kevin Jennings
Jordan McCloud
Rocco Becht
Matches Jake on
Differs from Jake on
Through 4 college seasons, his career arc tracks closest to Eli Peters’s path through Toledo.
Eli Peters
Ian Book
Jordan McCloud
John Rhys Plumlee
John Mateer
Matches Eli on
As a senior, his production profile tracks closest to Josh Hoover's senior season at TCU (2025).
Josh Hoover
Taulia Tagovailoa
Garrett Nussmeier
Owen McCown
Sam Hartman
Matches Josh on
Differs from Josh on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Rhett Lashlee
Pass share
53.7%
460 pass / 396 run
Plays / game
65.8
13 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
5.4%
333 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Balanced.
Coaching Lineage · 2022–2025
1 coachPlayed his entire career under Rhett Lashlee.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Trophy Case · Confirmed honors
What the selectors said
ALL-CONFERENCE
All-Conf mention (2024)
All-ACC
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
Conference-level recognition helps anchor whether a player is merely statistically loud or actually viewed as elite within his competitive lane.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | All-ACC | all_conference | SMU | ACC | QB |
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
Team, conference, and class by season.