CFB Zeitgeist Score
60
Solid starter in the position cohort. Carried by rec yards at the 67th percentile.
Kendrick Law
Kendrick Law arrives at Kentucky with a new fit to prove and an old chapter behind him.
4★ · NATIONAL RECRUIT
No.86
recruiting national rank
AI narrative · updated 2026-06-22 · compiled from CFB Zeitgeist data
Where He Ended Up · NFL
Detroit2026 NFL rookie season
WR · KENTUCKY · SEC
CFB Zeitgeist Score
60
Solid starter in the position cohort. Carried by rec yards at the 67th percentile.
Heisman Heat
#634
<1% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
<1%
TOP WR AWARD
Biletnikoff
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 2 · StarterImpact starter. Producing measurable value above replacement.
Development Trajectory · receiving yards
2022–2025Up 424% from first season to most-recent.
Career Arc
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 4-star | 0.9629 | No. 86 recruit | HighSchool | Alabama |
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Alabama -> Kentucky | 4-star | 0.9000 | Immediate |
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Achievements
Selector Grid · 2025
Selector recognition fills in once the major honors lists (AP, FWAA, AFCA, Walter Camp, Sporting News, SI) are scraped and ingested.
NIL · Recruiting · NFL Draft
Market value, pedigree & pro outcome
Recruit stars
★★★★☆
to Alabama
Composite
0.9629
#86 national
NFL Draft
2026 · Rd 5, Pick 28
#168 overall · Detroit
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment · Awaiting signal
The Room reads fan conversation around a player — who’s talking, what they believe, and how that shifts. It publishes once weekly volume rebuilds; for most players that’s in-season, when game-week chatter spikes.
Cohort divergence reads how different fanbases talk about this player. Returns once weekly mentions clear the publish floor.
Rival Radar
No rival-bucket mentions in the current season.
2025 Signature · 2025 season
540
yds
All FBS WRs, min 20 receptions
Why it matters
#180 of 531 All FBS WRs in receiving yards — 540 yards on 53 receptions.
Vs cohort
HIGH · n=53 cohort 531
Signature Moment
Week 12 vs Tennessee Tech — 124 receiving_yards_total
Result W 42-10
The week the volume broke through — put up 124 yds vs Tennessee Tech.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the receiving totals stand
To hit 700-yard receiver (currently 540): needs 160/game over remaining 1.
To hit 1,000-yard receiver (currently 540): needs 460/game over remaining 1.
To hit 60-catch season (currently 53): needs 7/game over remaining 1.
To hit 80-catch season (currently 53): needs 27/game over remaining 1.
To hit 8 receiving TDs (currently 3): needs 5/game over remaining 1.
To hit 10 receiving TDs (currently 3): needs 7/game over remaining 1.
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
Kendrick Law's story is about how role and output meet each other. For Kentucky, the card already shows enough current-season production to explain why he is on the serious-player board, and the next layer is determining whether the profile is just very good or actually distinctive.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
Target magnet | All-purpose weapon against FBS receiving peers.
2025 season snapshot | final
Receiving
Rushing
Returns
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 12 games
| Wk | Opp | REC | YDS | AVG | TD | LONG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | W 24-16vs Toledo | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Wk 2 | L 23-30vs Ole Miss | 6 | 44 | 7.3 | 0 | 18 | |
| Wk 3 | W 48-23vs Eastern Michigan | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 0 | 23 | |
| Wk 5 | L 13-35@ South Carolina | 5 | 41 | 8.2 | 0 | 11 | |
| Wk 6 | L 14-35@ Georgia | 6 | 64 | 10.7 | 1 | 38 | |
| Wk 8 | L 13-16vs Texas | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 0 | 22 | |
| Wk 9 | L 34-56vs Tennessee | 2 | 103 | 51.5 | 1 | 71 | |
| Wk 10 | W 10-3@ Auburn | 6 | 49 | 8.2 | 1 | 18 | |
| Wk 11 | W 38-7vs Florida | 6 | 44 | 7.3 | 0 | 25 | |
| Wk 12 | W 42-10vs Tennessee Tech | 11 | 124 | 11.3 | 0 | 43 | Season-high 124 yds |
| Wk 13 | L 17-45@ Vanderbilt | 3 | 5 | 1.7 | 0 | 4 | |
| Wk 14 | L 0-41@ Louisville | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 0 | 9 | |
| Total | 53 | 540 | 12.0 | 3 | 71 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
The player's share of a team's passing-game involvement. It is the fastest way to see whether the receiver is a true focal point or more of a complementary piece.
A blended workload view that accounts for catches, designed touches, and any return-game involvement that shapes the overall profile.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Receiving | Receptions | 53 | #101/1110 | 91st pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving yards | 540 | #185/1107 | 83rd pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving TD | 3 | #206/1111 | 82nd pct | Scoringvs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Yards / catch | 10.2 | #737/1106 | 33rd pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Returns | Kick return yards | 174 | #63/238 | 74th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Returns | Punt return yards | 8 | #181/224 | 20th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Usage | Pass share | 16.7% | #176/1137 | 85th pct | Air-game usagevs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Rushing yards | 53 | #56/397 | 86th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Rushing LONG | 16 | #93/346 | 73rd pct | Metricvs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Carries | 8 | #60/407 | 86th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Yards / carry | 6.6 | #109/393 | 73rd pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Rush TD | 0 | #81/411 | 81st pct | Scoringvs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving LONG | 71 | #89/1105 | 92nd pct | Metricvs FBS WR |
| Returns | Kick return avg | 19.3 | #120/236 | 50th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Returns | Kick returns | 9 | #59/243 | 76th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Returns | Punt returns | 3 | #141/237 | 41st pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Returns | Punt return avg | 2.7 | #191/222 | 14th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Usage | 2nd-down usage | 9.6% | #133/1137 | 88th pct | Middle-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Passing-down usage | 9.3% | #284/1137 | 75th pct | Known-passing sharevs FBS WR |
| Usage | Role share | 8.9% | #149/1137 | 87th pct | Share of team offensevs FBS WR |
| Usage | Standard-down usage | 8.7% | #117/1137 | 90th pct | Base-situation sharevs FBS WR |
| Usage | 1st-down usage | 8.6% | #146/1137 | 87th pct | Early-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | 3rd-down usage | 7.6% | #416/1137 | 64th pct | Money-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Rush share | 1.9% | #108/1137 | 91st pct | Ground-game usagevs FBS WR |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION · Rung None of 16
Why he’s here
Standing classification populates when honors, Heisman, and roster signals all align.
What moves him up
What moves him down
Accolade streams
Heisman model tracks the top FBS contenders weekly; this player hasn't entered the watch list yet.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 12 games
Home vs Road
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home7g | 4.3 | 52.1 | 16.4 | 0.1 |
| Road5g | 4.6 | 35.0 | 6.8 | 0.4 |
Win vs Loss
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins5g | 5.0 | 48.4 | 9.8 | 0.2 |
| Losses7g | 4.0 | 42.6 | 13.3 | 0.3 |
First half vs Second half
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-75g | 3.8 | 34.8 | 9.7 | 0.2 |
| Weeks 8+7g | 4.9 | 52.3 | 13.4 | 0.3 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the WR cohort
Elite: long catch (84th). Strength: rush yards (82nd). Concern: yards / catch (17th).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Advanced Savant · WR · 2024
Advanced opponent-adjusted percentile bars are coming soon for this player.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
Reliable target who converts on critical downs. Not flashy; consistently productive.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Demarcus Jones’s 2020 season.
Demarcus Jones
Brandon Inniss
Brett Buckman
Tyler Page
Mavin Anderson
Matches Demarcus on
Differs from Demarcus on
Through 4 college seasons, his career arc tracks closest to Caleb Burke’s path through New Hampshire.
Caleb Burke
Rico Bussey Jr.
Landon Wolf
Owen Glascoe
Abdul-Fatai Ibrahim
Matches Caleb on
As a senior, his production profile tracks closest to Lorenzo Lingard's senior season at Akron (2023).
Lorenzo Lingard
Dakota Thomas
Barion Brown
Tanner Knue
Dillon Bell
Matches Lorenzo on
Differs from Lorenzo on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Mark Stoops
Pass share
46.2%
366 pass / 427 run
Plays / game
66.1
12 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
10.0%
280 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Run-leaning.
Coaching Lineage · 2022–2025
1 coachPlayed his entire career under Mark Stoops.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
All-America, all-conference, player-of-the-week, watch-list, and postseason awards land here when they're earned. The absence is the signal: most players never collect formal honors, and that's its own kind of context.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No formal honors on the ledger yet. All-America, all-conference, weekly awards, watch lists, and postseason trophies land here when they’re earned. | ||||
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
Team, conference, and class by season.