CFB Zeitgeist Score
71
Solid starter in the position cohort. Carried by rec yards at the 88th percentile.
Jyrin Johnson
Below the discourse floor — the honest stats-only state.
466 REC YDS · 37 REC · 2 REC TD
2026 Outlook
Returning to Bowling Green for 2026
2026 Depth chart
Projected starter
Tight end · Bowling Green
Returning around him
2026 Award watch
No preseason watch lists yet (most drop June 15 – July 15)
Bowling Green · Last season: 4-8 · Talent rank #107 · 2026 recruiting class #94
TE · BOWLING GREEN · MID-AMERICAN
CFB Zeitgeist Score
71
Solid starter in the position cohort. Carried by rec yards at the 88th percentile.
Heisman Heat
Awaiting
Not on the live Heisman board this week.
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
—
TOP TE AWARD
Mackey
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 2 · StarterImpact starter. Producing measurable value above replacement.
Career Arc
Heisman futures · live sportsbook odds
#29 in market ▼ from #23 · 5 books
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No recruiting profile is on file for this player. | ||
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No transfer portal moves on file for this player. | ||
Where the model places this player relative to the rest of the Heisman field.
Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Achievements
Selector Grid · 2025
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment ·
Belief Meter
50
Mixed Sentiment
Top Take
“”
Trajectory
Rival Radar
No rival-bucket mentions in the current season.
2025 Signature · 2025 season
12.6
yds
All FBS WRs, min 20 receptions
Why it matters
#249 of 531 All FBS WRs at 12.6 yards per reception (37 catches).
Vs cohort
HIGH · n=37 cohort 531
Signature Moment
Week 2 at Cincinnati — 80 ypr
Result L 20-34
The week the volume broke through — put up 80 yds at Cincinnati.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the receiving totals stand
To hit 700-yard receiver (currently 466): needs 234/game over remaining 1.
To hit 1,000-yard receiver (currently 466): needs 534/game over remaining 1.
To hit 60-catch season (currently 37): needs 23/game over remaining 1.
To hit 80-catch season (currently 37): needs 43/game over remaining 1.
To hit 8 receiving TDs (currently 2): needs 6/game over remaining 1.
To hit 10 receiving TDs (currently 2): needs 8/game over remaining 1.
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
The useful clue on this card is not just the Heisman rank, but the broader honors spine. Jyrin Johnson already has 1 loaded recognition item, which helps distinguish a player who is merely productive from one who is already earning selector-level validation.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
Target magnet against FBS receiving peers.
2025 season snapshot | final
Receiving
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 12 games
| Wk | Opp | REC | YDS | AVG | TD | LONG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | W 26-7vs Lafayette | 1 | 22 | 22.0 | 0 | 22 | |
| Wk 2 | L 20-34@ Cincinnati | 7 | 80 | 11.4 | 1 | 31 | Season-high 80 yds |
| Wk 3 | W 23-13vs Liberty | 2 | 36 | 18.0 | 0 | 21 | |
| Wk 4 | L 17-40@ Louisville | 1 | 21 | 21.0 | 0 | 21 | |
| Wk 5 | L 20-35@ Ohio | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | 5 | |
| Wk 7 | W 28-23vs Toledo | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 0 | 16 | |
| Wk 8 | L 6-27vs Central Michigan | 5 | 36 | 7.2 | 0 | 17 | |
| Wk 9 | L 21-24@ Kent State | 3 | 53 | 17.7 | 0 | 29 | |
| Wk 10 | L 3-28vs Buffalo | 5 | 69 | 13.8 | 0 | 22 | |
| Wk 11 | L 21-27@ Eastern Michigan | 4 | 36 | 9.0 | 1 | 23 | |
| Wk 13 | L 16-19vs Akron | 3 | 63 | 21.0 | 0 | 38 | |
| Wk 14 | W 45-14@ Massachusetts | 2 | 20 | 10.0 | 0 | 10 | |
| Total | 37 | 466 | 13.7 | 2 | 38 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
| Season | Team | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Bowling Green | 37 | 466 | 12.6 | 2 | -- |
| Career | 1 loaded season | 37 | 466 | 12.6 | 2 | -- |
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
The tight end's share of the passing offense, which helps distinguish a featured receiving tight end from a secondary option.
A blended usage view that shows how often the offense flows through the tight end compared with other same-level peers.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Receiving | Receptions | 37 | #23/475 | 95th pct | Volumevs FBS TE |
| Receiving | Receiving yards | 466 | #21/475 | 96th pct | Volumevs FBS TE |
| Receiving | Receiving TD | 2 | #79/475 | 84th pct | Scoringvs FBS TE |
| Receiving | Yards / catch | 12.6 | #102/475 | 79th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS TE |
| Usage | Pass share | 19.6% | #6/468 | 99th pct | Air-game usagevs FBS TE |
| Receiving | Receiving LONG | 38 | #81/475 | 83rd pct | Metricvs FBS TE |
| Usage | Passing-down usage | 14.2% | #4/468 | 99th pct | Known-passing sharevs FBS TE |
| Usage | 2nd-down usage | 11.0% | #9/468 | 98th pct | Middle-down loadvs FBS TE |
| Usage | 3rd-down usage | 10.4% | #24/468 | 95th pct | Money-down loadvs FBS TE |
| Usage | Role share | 7.9% | #16/468 | 97th pct | Share of team offensevs FBS TE |
| Usage | Standard-down usage | 4.6% | #85/468 | 82nd pct | Base-situation sharevs FBS TE |
| Usage | 1st-down usage | 4.5% | #103/468 | 78th pct | Early-down loadvs FBS TE |
| Usage | Rush share | 0.0% | #58/468 | 88th pct | Ground-game usagevs FBS TE |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
ALL-CONF HM
ALL-CONF HM · Rung 9 of 16
Why he’s here
All-Conference honorable mention / 2nd team — the recognition has started.
What moves him up
A best-at-position run lifts to 1st team.
What moves him down
A back-end conference finish drops out of the honor list.
Accolade streams
The Mackey award tracker integrates per-week probability once a dedicated scraper for this award lands. Confirmed past winners and finalists for this player will surface here.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 12 games
Home vs Road
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home6g | 3.2 | 41.8 | 15.0 | 0.0 |
| Road6g | 3.0 | 35.8 | 12.3 | 0.3 |
Win vs Loss
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins4g | 2.0 | 25.8 | 14.6 | 0.0 |
| Losses8g | 3.6 | 45.4 | 13.3 | 0.2 |
First half vs Second half
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-76g | 2.5 | 31.5 | 14.3 | 0.2 |
| Weeks 8+6g | 3.7 | 46.2 | 13.1 | 0.2 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the TE cohort
Elite: rec yards (88th). Strength: receptions (85th).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Advanced Savant · TE · 2025
Advanced opponent-adjusted percentile bars are coming soon for this player.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
Dual-threat: blocks when needed, catches when needed. Coveted on both sides.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Toby Payne’s 2025 season.
Toby Payne
Hunter Tipton
Christian Sims
Michael Trigg
Boden Groen
Matches Toby on
Differs from Toby on
Not enough data yet for this comparison.
As a senior, his production profile tracks closest to R.J. Maryland's senior season at SMU (2025).
R.J. Maryland
Bru McCoy
Treyton Welch
D'Andre Rogers
Oscar Delp
Matches R.J. on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Eddie George
Pass share
37.7%
281 pass / 465 run
Plays / game
62.2
12 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
10.9%
265 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Run-heavy.
Coaching Lineage · 2025
1 coachPlayed his entire career under Eddie George.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Trophy Case · Confirmed honors
What the selectors said
ALL-CONFERENCE
All-Conf mention (2025)
All-MAC
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
Conference-level recognition helps anchor whether a player is merely statistically loud or actually viewed as elite within his competitive lane.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | All-MAC | all_conference | Bowling Green | MAC | TE |
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
| Season | Team | Role | Latest Model | Forecast | Win | Finalist | Official Finish | Points | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This player hasn’t appeared on a Heisman ballot tracked by the model. | |||||||||
Team, conference, and class by season.
| Season | Team | Conference | Pos | Class | Bio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Bowling Green | Mid-American | TE | 4 | No. 7 | 6-4 | 235 lb | Gonzales, LA |