CFB Zeitgeist Score
52
Mid-pack in the position cohort. Carried by rec yards at the 67th percentile.
Jalil Farooq
Jalil Farooq arrives at Maryland with a new fit to prove and an old chapter behind him.
4★ · NATIONAL RECRUIT
No.123
recruiting national rank
AI narrative · updated 2026-06-22 · compiled from CFB Zeitgeist data
2026 Outlook
Returning to Maryland for 2026
2026 Depth chart
Returning starter
Wide receiver · Maryland
Returning around him
2026 Award watch
No preseason watch lists yet (most drop June 15 – July 15)
Maryland · Last season: 4-8 · Talent rank #52 · 2026 recruiting class #25
WR · MARYLAND · BIG TEN
CFB Zeitgeist Score
52
Mid-pack in the position cohort. Carried by rec yards at the 67th percentile.
Heisman Heat
#1060
<1% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
<1%
TOP WR AWARD
Biletnikoff
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 2 · StarterStarter. A locked-in starting role.
Development Trajectory · receiving yards
2021–2025Up 690% from first season to most-recent.
Career Arc
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 4-star | 0.9441 | No. 123 recruit | HighSchool | Oklahoma |
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Oklahoma -> Maryland | 3-star | 0.8800 | Immediate |
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Selector Grid · 2025
Selector recognition fills in once the major honors lists (AP, FWAA, AFCA, Walter Camp, Sporting News, SI) are scraped and ingested.
NIL · Recruiting · NFL Draft
Market value, pedigree & pro outcome
Recruit stars
★★★★☆
to Oklahoma
Composite
0.9441
#123 national
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment · Awaiting signal
The Room reads fan conversation around a player — who’s talking, what they believe, and how that shifts. It publishes once weekly volume rebuilds; for most players that’s in-season, when game-week chatter spikes.
Cohort divergence reads how different fanbases talk about this player. Returns once weekly mentions clear the publish floor.
Rival Radar
No rival-bucket mentions in the current season.
2025 Signature · 2025 season
545
yds
All FBS WRs, min 20 receptions
Why it matters
#177 of 531 All FBS WRs in receiving yards — 545 yards on 58 receptions.
Vs cohort
HIGH · n=58 cohort 531
Signature Moment
Week 14 at Michigan State — 110 receiving_yards_total
Result L 28-38
The week the volume broke through — put up 110 yds at Michigan State.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the receiving totals stand
To hit 700-yard receiver (currently 545): needs 155/game over remaining 1.
To hit 1,000-yard receiver (currently 545): needs 455/game over remaining 1.
To hit 60-catch season (currently 58): needs 2/game over remaining 1.
To hit 80-catch season (currently 58): needs 22/game over remaining 1.
To hit 8 receiving TDs (currently 4): needs 4/game over remaining 1.
To hit 10 receiving TDs (currently 4): needs 6/game over remaining 1.
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
Jalil Farooq's story is about how role and output meet each other. For Maryland, the card already shows enough current-season production to explain why he is on the serious-player board, and the next layer is determining whether the profile is just very good or actually distinctive.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
Target magnet against FBS receiving peers.
2025 season snapshot | final
Receiving
Rushing
Returns
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 12 games
| Wk | Opp | REC | YDS | AVG | TD | LONG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | W 39-7vs Florida Atlantic | 4 | 43 | 10.8 | 0 | 24 | |
| Wk 2 | W 20-9vs Northern Illinois | 5 | 55 | 11.0 | 0 | 20 | |
| Wk 3 | W 44-17vs Towson | 5 | 53 | 10.6 | 0 | 18 | |
| Wk 4 | W 27-10@ Wisconsin | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 0 | 12 | |
| Wk 6 | L 20-24vs Washington | 8 | 51 | 6.4 | 0 | 16 | |
| Wk 7 | L 31-34vs Nebraska | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 0 | 8 | |
| Wk 8 | L 17-20@ UCLA | 4 | 29 | 7.3 | 1 | 10 | |
| Wk 10 | L 10-55vs Indiana | 4 | 43 | 10.8 | 0 | 21 | |
| Wk 11 | L 20-35@ Rutgers | 3 | 9 | 3.0 | 0 | 5 | |
| Wk 12 | L 6-24@ Illinois | 5 | 35 | 7.0 | 0 | 13 | |
| Wk 13 | L 20-45vs Michigan | 5 | 71 | 14.2 | 1 | 29 | |
| Wk 14 | L 28-38@ Michigan State | 10 | 110 | 11.0 | 2 | 24 | Season-high 110 yds |
| Total | 58 | 545 | 9.2 | 4 | 29 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
The player's share of a team's passing-game involvement. It is the fastest way to see whether the receiver is a true focal point or more of a complementary piece.
A blended workload view that accounts for catches, designed touches, and any return-game involvement that shapes the overall profile.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Receiving | Receptions | 58 | #73/1110 | 94th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving yards | 545 | #183/1107 | 84th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving TD | 4 | #152/1111 | 86th pct | Scoringvs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Yards / catch | 9.4 | #799/1106 | 28th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Returns | Punt return yards | 46 | #111/224 | 51st pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Usage | Pass share | 15.9% | #204/1137 | 82nd pct | Air-game usagevs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Rushing yards | 8 | #220/397 | 45th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Rushing LONG | 6 | #238/346 | 32nd pct | Metricvs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Yards / carry | 4.0 | #211/393 | 47th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Carries | 2 | #194/407 | 53rd pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Rush TD | 0 | #81/411 | 81st pct | Scoringvs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving LONG | 29 | #611/1105 | 45th pct | Metricvs FBS WR |
| Returns | Punt return avg | 7.7 | #117/222 | 48th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Returns | Punt returns | 6 | #113/237 | 53rd pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Usage | Passing-down usage | 11.9% | #132/1137 | 88th pct | Known-passing sharevs FBS WR |
| Usage | 3rd-down usage | 11.0% | #171/1137 | 85th pct | Money-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | 2nd-down usage | 10.9% | #81/1137 | 93rd pct | Middle-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Role share | 10.0% | #98/1137 | 91st pct | Share of team offensevs FBS WR |
| Usage | 1st-down usage | 9.7% | #100/1137 | 91st pct | Early-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Standard-down usage | 9.1% | #98/1137 | 91st pct | Base-situation sharevs FBS WR |
| Usage | Rush share | 0.7% | #239/1137 | 79th pct | Ground-game usagevs FBS WR |
| Ball Security | Fumbles lost | 0 | #1/302 | 100th pct | Turnoversvs FBS WR |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION · Rung None of 16
Why he’s here
Standing classification populates when honors, Heisman, and roster signals all align.
What moves him up
What moves him down
Accolade streams
Heisman model tracks the top FBS contenders weekly; this player hasn't entered the watch list yet.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 12 games
Home vs Road
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home7g | 4.7 | 47.3 | 10.2 | 0.1 |
| Road5g | 5.0 | 42.8 | 7.7 | 0.6 |
Win vs Loss
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins4g | 4.2 | 45.5 | 10.7 | 0.0 |
| Losses8g | 5.1 | 45.4 | 8.4 | 0.5 |
First half vs Second half
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-76g | 4.5 | 41.3 | 9.4 | 0.0 |
| Weeks 8+6g | 5.2 | 49.5 | 8.9 | 0.7 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the WR cohort
Elite: receptions (86th). Strength: fumbles lost (80th). Concern: yards / catch (12th).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Advanced Savant · WR · 2024
Advanced opponent-adjusted percentile bars are coming soon for this player.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
Reliable target who converts on critical downs. Not flashy; consistently productive.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Myles Butler’s 2025 season.
Myles Butler
Kaden Prather
Jack Bech
CJ Windham
Austin Williams
Matches Myles on
Through 3 college seasons, his career arc tracks closest to Taylor Grimes’s path through Incarnate Word.
Taylor Grimes
Hunter Long
Ma'jon Wright
Anthony Lowe
Ryan Flournoy
Matches Taylor on
As a graduate, his production profile tracks closest to Michael Jackson III's graduate season at Purdue (2025).
Michael Jackson III
Joseph Manjack
Keagan Johnson
C.J. Daniels
Michael Washington
Matches Michael on
Differs from Michael on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Mike Locksley
Pass share
61.9%
491 pass / 302 run
Plays / game
66.1
12 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
2.3%
383 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Pass-leaning.
Coaching Lineage · 2021–2025
1 coachPlayed his entire career under Mike Locksley.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
All-America, all-conference, player-of-the-week, watch-list, and postseason awards land here when they're earned. The absence is the signal: most players never collect formal honors, and that's its own kind of context.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No formal honors on the ledger yet. All-America, all-conference, weekly awards, watch lists, and postseason trophies land here when they’re earned. | ||||
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
| Season | Team | Role | Latest Model | Forecast | Win | Finalist | Official Finish | Points | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Oklahoma | WR4 | #1060 | #1060 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W16 snapshot | SEC |
| 2023 | Oklahoma | WR4 | #416 | #386 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W19 snapshot | Big 12 |
| 2022 | Oklahoma | WR4 | #431 | #551 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W20 snapshot | Big 12 |
| 2021 | Oklahoma | WR4 | #1302 | #1038 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W20 snapshot | Big 12 |
Team, conference, and class by season.
| Season | Team | Conference | Pos | Class | Bio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Maryland | Big Ten | WR | 4 | No. 1 | 6-2 | 213 lb | Lanham, MD |
| 2024 | Oklahoma | SEC | WR | 4 | No. 1 | 6-2 | 213 lb | Lanham, MD |
| 2023 | Oklahoma | Big 12 | WR | 4 | No. 1 | 6-2 | 213 lb | Lanham, MD |
| 2022 | Oklahoma | Big 12 | WR | 4 | No. 1 | 6-2 | 213 lb | Lanham, MD |
| 2021 | Oklahoma | Big 12 | WR | 4 | No. 1 | 6-2 | 213 lb | Lanham, MD |