CFB Zeitgeist Score
50
Mid-pack in the position cohort. Carried by rec tds at the 68th percentile.
Gavin Freeman
Below the discourse floor — the honest stats-only state.
481 REC YDS · 53 REC · 4 REC TD
Where He Ended Up · Transfer
Transferred to Baylor
WR · OKLAHOMA STATE · BIG 12
CFB Zeitgeist Score
50
Mid-pack in the position cohort. Carried by rec tds at the 68th percentile.
Heisman Heat
#3120
<1% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
<1%
TOP WR AWARD
Biletnikoff
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 2 · StarterImpact starter. Producing measurable value above replacement.
Development Trajectory · receiving yards
2022–2025Up 946% from first season to most-recent.
Career Arc
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 3-star | 0.8285 | No. 1744 recruit | HighSchool | Oklahoma |
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Oklahoma State -> Baylor | 3-star | 0.8600 | Immediate |
| 2024 | Oklahoma -> Oklahoma State | 3-star | 0.8500 | Immediate |
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Achievements
Selector Grid · 2025
Selector recognition fills in once the major honors lists (AP, FWAA, AFCA, Walter Camp, Sporting News, SI) are scraped and ingested.
NIL · Recruiting · NFL Draft
Market value, pedigree & pro outcome
Recruit stars
★★★☆☆
to Oklahoma
Composite
0.8285
#1744 national
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment ·
Belief Meter
50
Mixed Sentiment
Top Take
“”
Trajectory
Rival Radar
No rival-bucket mentions in the current season.
2025 Signature · 2025 season
4
count
All FBS WRs, min 20 receptions
Why it matters
#161 of 531 All FBS WRs in receiving TDs — 4 TDs on 53 receptions.
Vs cohort
HIGH · n=53 cohort 531
Signature Moment
Week 10 at Kansas — 1 receiving_tds
Result L 21-38
The week the volume broke through — stacked 1 td at Kansas.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the receiving totals stand
To hit 700-yard receiver (currently 481): needs 219/game over remaining 1.
To hit 1,000-yard receiver (currently 481): needs 519/game over remaining 1.
To hit 60-catch season (currently 53): needs 7/game over remaining 1.
To hit 80-catch season (currently 53): needs 27/game over remaining 1.
To hit 8 receiving TDs (currently 4): needs 4/game over remaining 1.
To hit 10 receiving TDs (currently 4): needs 6/game over remaining 1.
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
Gavin Freeman's story is about how role and output meet each other. For Oklahoma State, the card already shows enough current-season production to explain why he is on the serious-player board, and the next layer is determining whether the profile is just very good or actually distinctive.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
Target magnet against FBS receiving peers.
2025 season snapshot | final
Receiving
Rushing
Returns
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 12 games
| Wk | Opp | REC | YDS | AVG | TD | LONG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | W 27-7vs UT Martin | 5 | 46 | 9.2 | 1 | 12 | |
| Wk 2 | L 3-69@ Oregon | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | 3 | |
| Wk 4 | L 12-19vs Tulsa | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 0 | 22 | |
| Wk 5 | L 27-45vs Baylor | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 0 | 21 | |
| Wk 6 | L 13-41@ Arizona | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 0 | 18 | |
| Wk 7 | L 17-39vs Houston | 3 | 59 | 19.7 | 1 | 33 | |
| Wk 8 | L 17-49vs Cincinnati | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 0 | 11 | |
| Wk 9 | L 0-42@ Texas Tech | 6 | 47 | 7.8 | 0 | 15 | |
| Wk 10 | L 21-38@ Kansas | 7 | 78 | 11.1 | 1 | 33 | Season-high 78 yds |
| Wk 12 | L 6-14vs Kansas State | 5 | 37 | 7.4 | 0 | 17 | |
| Wk 13 | L 14-17@ UCF | 5 | 40 | 8.0 | 1 | 12 | |
| Wk 14 | L 13-20vs Iowa State | 7 | 46 | 6.6 | 0 | 12 | |
| Total | 53 | 481 | 9.1 | 4 | 33 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
| Season | Team | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Oklahoma State | 53 | 481 | 9.1 | 4 | -- |
| 2023 | Oklahoma | 19 | 95 | 5.0 | 1 | -- |
| 2022 | Oklahoma | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 0 | -- |
| Career | 3 loaded seasons | 75 | 622 | 8.3 | 5 | -- |
| Season | Team | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Oklahoma State | 12 | 48 | 44 | 68 | -- |
| 2023 | Oklahoma | 5 | 20 | -- | 122 | 1 |
| 2022 | Oklahoma | 7 | 71 | -- | -- | -- |
| Career | 3 loaded seasons | 24 | 139 | 44 | 190 | 1 |
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
The player's share of a team's passing-game involvement. It is the fastest way to see whether the receiver is a true focal point or more of a complementary piece.
A blended workload view that accounts for catches, designed touches, and any return-game involvement that shapes the overall profile.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Receiving | Receptions | 53 | #101/1110 | 91st pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving yards | 481 | #238/1107 | 79th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving TD | 4 | #152/1111 | 86th pct | Scoringvs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Yards / catch | 9.1 | #824/1106 | 26th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Returns | Kick return yards | 44 | #134/238 | 44th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Returns | Punt return yards | 68 | #86/224 | 62nd pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Usage | Pass share | 13.2% | #311/1137 | 73rd pct | Air-game usagevs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Rushing yards | 48 | #61/397 | 85th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Rushing LONG | 13 | #134/346 | 62nd pct | Metricvs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Carries | 12 | #37/407 | 91st pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Yards / carry | 4.0 | #211/393 | 47th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Rush TD | 0 | #81/411 | 81st pct | Scoringvs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving LONG | 33 | #568/1105 | 49th pct | Metricvs FBS WR |
| Returns | Punt returns | 17 | #27/237 | 89th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Returns | Kick return avg | 14.7 | #180/236 | 24th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Returns | Punt return avg | 4.0 | #173/222 | 23rd pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Returns | Kick returns | 3 | #108/243 | 56th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Usage | 2nd-down usage | 10.3% | #100/1137 | 91st pct | Middle-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Passing-down usage | 9.9% | #245/1137 | 79th pct | Known-passing sharevs FBS WR |
| Usage | Role share | 8.2% | #199/1137 | 83rd pct | Share of team offensevs FBS WR |
| Usage | 3rd-down usage | 7.8% | #386/1137 | 66th pct | Money-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Standard-down usage | 7.2% | #203/1137 | 82nd pct | Base-situation sharevs FBS WR |
| Usage | 1st-down usage | 6.8% | #256/1137 | 78th pct | Early-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Rush share | 3.4% | #42/1137 | 96th pct | Ground-game usagevs FBS WR |
| Ball Security | Fumbles lost | 1 | #131/302 | 57th pct | Turnoversvs FBS WR |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION · Rung None of 16
Why he’s here
Standing classification populates when honors, Heisman, and roster signals all align.
What moves him up
What moves him down
Accolade streams
Heisman model tracks the top FBS contenders weekly; this player hasn't entered the watch list yet.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 12 games
Home vs Road
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home7g | 4.4 | 41.0 | 10.1 | 0.3 |
| Road5g | 4.4 | 38.8 | 7.7 | 0.4 |
Win vs Loss
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins1g | 5.0 | 46.0 | 9.2 | 1.0 |
| Losses11g | 4.4 | 39.5 | 9.1 | 0.3 |
First half vs Second half
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-76g | 3.2 | 33.8 | 10.1 | 0.3 |
| Weeks 8+6g | 5.7 | 46.3 | 8.1 | 0.3 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the WR cohort
Elite: receptions (81st). Strength: rush yards (81st). Concern: yards / catch (9th).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Advanced Savant · WR · 2024
Advanced opponent-adjusted percentile bars are coming soon for this player.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
Runs precise routes in tight quarters. Volume player who keeps chains moving.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Hassan Beydoun’s 2022 season.
Hassan Beydoun
Aaron Turner
Myles Price
Deion Burks
Yusuf Ali
Matches Hassan on
Differs from Hassan on
Through 2 college seasons, his career arc tracks closest to Briley Moore’s path through Kansas State.
Briley Moore
Daniel Crawford
Cee Jay Powell
Rico Bussey Jr.
Damoriea Vick
Matches Briley on
As a senior, his production profile tracks closest to Javen Jacobs's senior season at Utah State (2025).
Javen Jacobs
Javen Nicholas
Dalen Cobb
Dashaun Davis
Mekhi Mews
Matches Javen on
Differs from Javen on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Mike Gundy
Pass share
47.5%
365 pass / 403 run
Plays / game
64.0
12 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
9.9%
223 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Balanced.
Coaching Lineage · 2022–2025
1 coachPlayed his entire career under Mike Gundy.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
All-America, all-conference, player-of-the-week, watch-list, and postseason awards land here when they're earned. The absence is the signal: most players never collect formal honors, and that's its own kind of context.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No formal honors on the ledger yet. All-America, all-conference, weekly awards, watch lists, and postseason trophies land here when they’re earned. | ||||
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
| Season | Team | Role | Latest Model | Forecast | Win | Finalist | Official Finish | Points | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Oklahoma State | WR3 | #3120 | #3082 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W16 snapshot | Big 12 |
| 2023 | Oklahoma | WR3 | #1444 | #1186 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W19 snapshot | Big 12 |
| 2022 | Oklahoma | WR3 | #1725 | #1877 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W20 snapshot | Big 12 |
Team, conference, and class by season.
| Season | Team | Conference | Pos | Class | Bio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Oklahoma State | Big 12 | WR | 3 | No. 17 | 5-8 | 185 lb | Oklahoma City, OK |
| 2024 | Oklahoma State | Big 12 | WR | 3 | No. 17 | 5-8 | 185 lb | Oklahoma City, OK |
| 2023 | Oklahoma | Big 12 | WR | 3 | No. 17 | 5-8 | 185 lb | Oklahoma City, OK |
| 2022 | Oklahoma | Big 12 | WR | 3 | No. 17 | 5-8 | 185 lb | Oklahoma City, OK |