CFB Zeitgeist Score
68
Solid starter in the position cohort. Carried by rec tds at the 78th percentile.
DT Sheffield
Below the discourse floor — the honest stats-only state.
577 REC YDS · 44 REC · 5 REC TD
2026 Outlook
Returning to Rutgers for 2026
2026 Depth chart
Projected starter
Wide receiver · Rutgers
Returning around him
2026 Award watch
No preseason watch lists yet (most drop June 15 – July 15)
Rutgers · Last season: 5-7 · Talent rank #53 · 2026 recruiting class #33
WR · RUTGERS · BIG TEN
CFB Zeitgeist Score
68
Solid starter in the position cohort. Carried by rec tds at the 78th percentile.
Heisman Heat
#2402
<1% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
<1%
TOP WR AWARD
Biletnikoff
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 2 · StarterPart-time starter. Splitting first-team reps.
Development Trajectory · receiving yards
2023–2025Up 2409% from first season to most-recent.
Career Arc
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 3-star | 0.8639 | No. 55 recruit | JUCO | Washington State |
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | North Texas -> Rutgers | 3-star | 0.8900 | Immediate |
| 2024 | Washington State -> North Texas | 3-star | 0.8400 | Immediate |
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Selector Grid · 2025
Selector recognition fills in once the major honors lists (AP, FWAA, AFCA, Walter Camp, Sporting News, SI) are scraped and ingested.
NIL · Recruiting · NFL Draft
Market value, pedigree & pro outcome
Recruit stars
★★★☆☆
to Washington State
Composite
0.8639
#55 national
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment · Awaiting signal
The Room reads fan conversation around a player — who’s talking, what they believe, and how that shifts. It publishes once weekly volume rebuilds; for most players that’s in-season, when game-week chatter spikes.
Cohort divergence reads how different fanbases talk about this player. Returns once weekly mentions clear the publish floor.
Rival Radar
No rival-bucket mentions in the current season.
2025 Signature · 2025 season
13.1
yds
All FBS WRs, min 20 receptions
Why it matters
#220 of 531 All FBS WRs at 13.1 yards per reception (44 catches).
Vs cohort
HIGH · n=44 cohort 531
Signature Moment
Week 1 vs Ohio — 85 ypr
Result W 34-31
The week the volume broke through — put up 85 yds vs Ohio.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the receiving totals stand
To hit 700-yard receiver (currently 577): needs 123/game over remaining 1.
To hit 1,000-yard receiver (currently 577): needs 423/game over remaining 1.
To hit 60-catch season (currently 44): needs 16/game over remaining 1.
To hit 80-catch season (currently 44): needs 36/game over remaining 1.
To hit 8 receiving TDs (currently 5): needs 3/game over remaining 1.
To hit 10 receiving TDs (currently 5): needs 5/game over remaining 1.
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
The useful clue on this card is not just the Heisman rank, but the broader honors spine. DT Sheffield already has 1 loaded recognition item, which helps distinguish a player who is merely productive from one who is already earning selector-level validation.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
Target magnet against FBS receiving peers.
2025 season snapshot | final
Receiving
Returns
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 12 games
| Wk | Opp | REC | YDS | AVG | TD | LONG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | W 34-31vs Ohio | 4 | 85 | 21.3 | 1 | 54 | Season-high 85 yds |
| Wk 2 | W 45-17vs Miami (OH) | 5 | 37 | 7.4 | 1 | 11 | |
| Wk 3 | W 60-10vs Norfolk State | 3 | 79 | 26.3 | 0 | 51 | |
| Wk 4 | L 28-38vs Iowa | 3 | 51 | 17.0 | 0 | 40 | |
| Wk 5 | L 28-31@ Minnesota | 5 | 74 | 14.8 | 1 | 29 | |
| Wk 7 | L 19-38@ Washington | 6 | 68 | 11.3 | 0 | 41 | |
| Wk 8 | L 10-56vs Oregon | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 0 | 11 | |
| Wk 9 | W 27-24@ Purdue | 3 | 24 | 8.0 | 0 | 11 | |
| Wk 10 | L 13-35@ Illinois | 4 | 32 | 8.0 | 0 | 9 | |
| Wk 11 | W 35-20vs Maryland | 4 | 56 | 14.0 | 1 | 31 | |
| Wk 13 | L 9-42@ Ohio State | 2 | 18 | 9.0 | 0 | 10 | |
| Wk 14 | L 36-40vs Penn State | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 1 | 21 | |
| Total | 44 | 577 | 13.3 | 5 | 54 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
| Season | Team | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Rutgers | 44 | 577 | 13.1 | 5 | -- |
| 2023 | Washington State | 5 | 23 | 4.6 | 0 | -- |
| Career | 2 loaded seasons | 49 | 600 | 12.2 | 5 | -- |
| Season | Team | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Rutgers | -- | -- | -- | 12 | -- |
| 2023 | Washington State | -- | -- | -- | 31 | -- |
| Career | 2 loaded seasons | -- | -- | -- | 43 | -- |
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
The player's share of a team's passing-game involvement. It is the fastest way to see whether the receiver is a true focal point or more of a complementary piece.
A blended workload view that accounts for catches, designed touches, and any return-game involvement that shapes the overall profile.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Receiving | Receptions | 44 | #153/1110 | 86th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving yards | 577 | #165/1107 | 85th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving TD | 5 | #96/1111 | 91st pct | Scoringvs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Yards / catch | 13.1 | #441/1106 | 60th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Returns | Punt return yards | 12 | #165/224 | 27th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Usage | Pass share | 17.3% | #156/1137 | 86th pct | Air-game usagevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving LONG | 54 | #228/1105 | 79th pct | Metricvs FBS WR |
| Returns | Punt return avg | 6.0 | #144/222 | 36th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Returns | Punt returns | 2 | #156/237 | 35th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Usage | Passing-down usage | 12.0% | #130/1137 | 89th pct | Known-passing sharevs FBS WR |
| Usage | 3rd-down usage | 11.3% | #161/1137 | 86th pct | Money-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Role share | 8.6% | #168/1137 | 85th pct | Share of team offensevs FBS WR |
| Usage | 2nd-down usage | 7.7% | #243/1137 | 79th pct | Middle-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | 1st-down usage | 7.1% | #229/1137 | 80th pct | Early-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Standard-down usage | 7.1% | #211/1137 | 82nd pct | Base-situation sharevs FBS WR |
| Usage | Rush share | 0.0% | #391/1137 | 66th pct | Ground-game usagevs FBS WR |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION · Rung None of 16
Why he’s here
Standing classification populates when honors, Heisman, and roster signals all align.
What moves him up
What moves him down
Accolade streams
Heisman model tracks the top FBS contenders weekly; this player hasn't entered the watch list yet.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 12 games
Home vs Road
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home7g | 3.4 | 51.6 | 15.5 | 0.6 |
| Road5g | 4.0 | 43.2 | 10.2 | 0.2 |
Win vs Loss
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins5g | 3.8 | 56.2 | 15.4 | 0.6 |
| Losses7g | 3.6 | 42.3 | 11.8 | 0.3 |
First half vs Second half
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-76g | 4.3 | 65.7 | 16.4 | 0.5 |
| Weeks 8+6g | 3.0 | 30.5 | 10.2 | 0.3 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the WR cohort
Production sits in the middle of the position cohort across the board.
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Advanced Savant · WR · 2024
Advanced opponent-adjusted percentile bars are coming soon for this player.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
Reliable target who converts on critical downs. Not flashy; consistently productive.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Tahj Washington’s 2020 season.
Tahj Washington
Taylor Morin
DeMeer Blankumsee
Braden Smith
Devonte Ross
Matches Tahj on
Differs from Tahj on
Through 3 college seasons, his career arc tracks closest to Taylor Grimes’s path through Incarnate Word.
Taylor Grimes
Hunter Long
Ma'jon Wright
Michael Pettway
Braeden Wisloski
Matches Taylor on
As a junior, his production profile tracks closest to Amad Anderson's junior season at Temple (2022).
Amad Anderson
TJ Sheffield
Raylen Sharpe
Devin Maddox
Jordan Faison
Matches Amad on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Greg Schiano
Pass share
45.1%
378 pass / 460 run
Plays / game
69.8
12 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
11.1%
359 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Run-leaning.
Coaching Lineage · 2023–2025
1 coachPlayed his entire career under Greg Schiano.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Trophy Case · Confirmed honors
What the selectors said
ALL-CONFERENCE
All-Conf mention (2024)
All-AAC
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
Conference-level recognition helps anchor whether a player is merely statistically loud or actually viewed as elite within his competitive lane.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | All-AAC | all_conference | North Texas | AAC | WR |
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
| Season | Team | Role | Latest Model | Forecast | Win | Finalist | Official Finish | Points | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | North Texas | WR4 | #2402 | #2173 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W16 snapshot | American Athletic |
| 2023 | Washington State | WR4 | #3172 | #3268 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W19 snapshot | Pac-12 |
Team, conference, and class by season.
| Season | Team | Conference | Pos | Class | Bio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Rutgers | Big Ten | WR | 4 | 5-10 | 175 lb | Corinth, MS |
| 2024 | North Texas | American Athletic | WR | 4 | 5-10 | 175 lb | Corinth, MS |
| 2023 | Washington State | Pac-12 | WR | 4 | 5-10 | 175 lb | Corinth, MS |