CFB Zeitgeist Score
79
All-Conference in the position cohort. Carried by yards / att at the 98th percentile.
Drew Mestemaker
Below the discourse floor — the honest stats-only state.
4,369 PASS YDS · 34 PASS TD · 89 RUSH YDS
Where He Ended Up · Transfer
Transferred to Oklahoma State
QB · NORTH TEXAS · AMERICAN ATHLETIC
CFB Zeitgeist Score
79
All-Conference in the position cohort. Carried by yards / att at the 98th percentile.
Heisman Heat
#952
<1% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
<1%
TOP QB AWARD
Davey O'Brien
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 2 · StarterImpact starter. Producing measurable value above replacement.
Career Arc
Heisman futures · live sportsbook odds
#27 in market ▲ from #41 · 6 books
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No recruiting profile is on file for this player. | ||
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | North Texas -> Oklahoma State | 5-star | 0.9800 | Immediate |
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Achievements
Selector Grid · 2025
NIL Valuation
Market value
NIL Valuation · On3
$2.42M
#12 nationally · Jun 2026
Whisper Rate
$3.50M
per-deal market estimate
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment · Season 2025 conversation window
Belief Meter
53
Reading The Room
Top Take
“”
Trajectory
Rival Radar
No rival-bucket mentions in the current season.
Signature Story
He hasn't written his page yet — we'll start filling it in when there are enough snaps to rank against his peers.
Signature Moment
No signature moment on the ledger yet.
Returns once this player puts together a multi-game body of work — single-game flashes alone don't clear the bar.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the passing totals stand
✓ Hit 3,000-yard season · finished with 4,369.
✓ Hit 4,000-yard season · finished with 4,369.
✓ Hit 25 passing TDs · finished with 34.
✓ Hit 30 passing TDs · finished with 34.
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
The unusual part of Drew Mestemaker's case is that the production comes in two channels, not one. For North Texas, he has 4,369 passing yards and 34 touchdown passes, but he also adds 89 rushing yards and 5 rushing scores. That kind of dual-threat load tends to create a more resilient Heisman case because the offense can tilt the game in multiple ways.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
High-volume passer | Efficient | Vertical threat against FBS QB peers. The quickest read is whether the profile wins on volume, efficiency, explosiveness, or rushing value.
2025 season snapshot | final
Passing Efficiency
Passing Production
Rushing
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 14 games
| Wk | Opp | CMP/ATT | YDS | TD | INT | YPA | QBR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | W 51-0vs Lamar | 24/32 | 329 | 3 | 0 | 10.3 | 87.3 | 3 TD passes |
| Wk 2 | W 33-30@ Western Michigan | 18/33 | 224 | 2 | 0 | 6.8 | 51.7 | |
| Wk 3 | W 59-10vs Washington State | 24/29 | 211 | 4 | 0 | 7.3 | 82.8 | 4 TD passes |
| Wk 4 | W 45-38@ Army | 26/36 | 249 | 1 | 0 | 6.9 | 74.3 | |
| Wk 5 | W 36-22vs South Alabama | 14/26 | 234 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 | 48.5 | |
| Wk 7 | L 36-63vs South Florida | 30/48 | 326 | 2 | 3 | 6.8 | 47.6 | 3 INTs — rough day |
| Wk 8 | W 55-17vs UTSA | 22/35 | 277 | 4 | 0 | 7.9 | 68.3 | 4 TD passes |
| Wk 9 | W 54-20@ Charlotte | 37/49 | 608 | 4 | 1 | 12.4 | 42.6 | Season-high 608 yds |
| Wk 10 | W 31-17vs Navy | 19/24 | 234 | 0 | 0 | 9.8 | 72.3 | |
| Wk 12 | W 53-24@ UAB | 18/25 | 298 | 2 | 0 | 11.9 | 88.2 | Clean 2-TD game |
| Wk 13 | W 56-24@ Rice | 19/23 | 469 | 3 | 0 | 20.4 | 99.2 | 3 TD passes |
| Wk 14 | W 52-25vs Temple | 20/24 | 366 | 3 | 0 | 15.3 | 98.8 | 3 TD passes |
| Wk 15 | L 21-34@ Tulane | 21/34 | 294 | 2 | 3 | 8.6 | 59.1 | 3 INTs — rough day |
| Bowl | W 49-47@ San Diego State | 27/47 | 250 | 3 | 2 | 5.3 | 70.3 | |
| Total | 319/465 | 4369 | 34 | 9 | 9.9 | 70.8 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
| Season | Team | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | North Texas | 319 | 465 | 68.6% | 4,369 | 9.4 | 34 | 9 | 167.8 | -- | -- |
| Career | 1 loaded season | 319 | 465 | 68.6% | 4,369 | 9.4 | 34 | 9 | 167.8 | -- | -- |
| Season | Team | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | North Texas | 57 | 89 | 1.6 | 5 | -- |
| Career | 1 loaded season | 57 | 89 | 1.6 | 5 | -- |
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
Opponent-adjusted passing value. Positive numbers mean the quarterback is adding more value through the air than a neutral peer would in the same environment.
How much of the offense runs through the quarterback once passing and rushing responsibility are blended together.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passing | Passing yards | 4,369 | #1/382 | 100th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Pass TD | 34 | #2/407 | 100th pct | Scoringvs FBS QB |
| Passing | Completions | 319 | #6/383 | 99th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Completion % | 68.6% | #78/383 | 80th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Passing | Yards / attempt | 9.4 | #39/382 | 90th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rushing yards | 89 | #142/408 | 65th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Value | Passing WEPA | +0.42 | #20/200 | 90th pct | Opponent-adjusted passing value | 440 weighted playsvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Role share | 47.2% | #104/428 | 76th pct | Share of team offensevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Attempts | 465 | #10/407 | 98th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Interceptions | 9 | #359/407 | 12th pct | Turnoversvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Carries | 57 | #108/408 | 74th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rushing LONG | 31 | #105/391 | 73rd pct | Metricvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rush TD | 5 | #59/408 | 86th pct | Scoringvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Yards / carry | 1.6 | #269/407 | 34th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Pass share | 91.4% | #48/428 | 89th pct | Air-game usagevs FBS QB |
| Usage | Passing-down usage | 57.5% | #116/428 | 73rd pct | Known-passing sharevs FBS QB |
| Usage | 3rd-down usage | 54.5% | #130/428 | 70th pct | Money-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | 2nd-down usage | 50.0% | #80/428 | 82nd pct | Middle-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Standard-down usage | 43.7% | #84/428 | 81st pct | Base-situation sharevs FBS QB |
| Usage | 1st-down usage | 42.7% | #89/428 | 79th pct | Early-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Rush share | 7.5% | #210/428 | 51st pct | Ground-game usagevs FBS QB |
| Value | Rushing WEPA | +0.21 | #90/140 | 36th pct | Opponent-adjusted rushing value | 34 weighted playsvs FBS QB |
| Ball Security | Fumbles lost | 1 | #69/258 | 74th pct | Turnoversvs FBS QB |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
ALL-CONF HM
ALL-CONF HM · Rung 9 of 16
Why he’s here
All-Conference honorable mention / 2nd team — the recognition has started.
What moves him up
A best-at-position run lifts to 1st team.
What moves him down
A back-end conference finish drops out of the honor list.
Accolade streams
Heisman model tracks the top FBS contenders weekly; this player hasn't entered the watch list yet.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 14 games
Home vs Road
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home7g | 282 | 2.4 | 9.5 | 0.4 |
| Road7g | 342 | 2.4 | 10.3 | 0.9 |
Win vs Loss
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins12g | 312 | 2.5 | 10.3 | 0.2 |
| Losses2g | 310 | 2.0 | 7.7 | 3.0 |
First half vs Second half
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-77g | 260 | 2.3 | 7.5 | 0.7 |
| Weeks 8+7g | 364 | 2.6 | 12.3 | 0.6 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the QB cohort
Elite: pass yards (99th). Strength: pass tds (98th). Concern: interceptions (21st).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Pass Profile · Completion depth (PBP)
Where the throws are landing
Short
0–9 ydsMiddle
10–19 ydsDeep
20+ ydsOverall 65.2% completion on 227 attempts · 26 deep completions averaging 29.5 yds.
Advanced Savant · QB · 2024
Elite: EPA / dropback.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
High-percentage passer who protects the ball. Loses the matchup on improvisation.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to CJ Carr’s 2025 season.
CJ Carr
Darian Mensah
Kenny Pickett
Desmond Ridder
Tyler Van Dyke
Matches CJ on
Through 1 college season, his career arc tracks closest to Dante Moore’s path through Oregon.
Dante Moore
J.J. McCarthy
Jayden Maiava
CJ Carr
Skylar John Thompson
Matches Dante on
As a sophomore, his production profile tracks closest to Darian Mensah's sophomore season at Duke (2025).
Darian Mensah
Desmond Ridder
Amari Odom
J.J. McCarthy
CJ Bailey
Matches Darian on
Differs from Darian on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Eric Morris
Pass share
48.5%
475 pass / 504 run
Plays / game
69.9
14 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
5.9%
321 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Balanced.
Coaching Lineage · 2025
1 coachPlayed his entire career under Eric Morris.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Trophy Case · Confirmed honors
What the selectors said
ALL-CONFERENCE
All-Conf mention (2025)
All-AAC
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
Conference-level recognition helps anchor whether a player is merely statistically loud or actually viewed as elite within his competitive lane.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Burlsworth | position_award | North Texas | Burlsworth | winner | QB |
| 2025 | All-AAC | all_conference | North Texas | AAC | QB |
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
| Season | Team | Role | Latest Model | Forecast | Win | Finalist | Official Finish | Points | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | North Texas | QB1 | #952 | #818 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W16 snapshot | American Athletic |
Team, conference, and class by season.
| Season | Team | Conference | Pos | Class | Bio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | North Texas | American Athletic | QB | 1 | No. 17 | 6-4 | 211 lb | Austin, TX |
| 2024 | North Texas | American Athletic | QB | 1 | No. 17 | 6-4 | 211 lb | Austin, TX |