CFB Zeitgeist Score
89
All-Conference in the position cohort. Carried by rec yards at the 97th percentile.
Dallen Bentley
Below the discourse floor — the honest stats-only state.
620 REC YDS · 48 REC · 6 REC TD
Where He Ended Up · NFL
Denver2026 NFL rookie season
TE · UTAH · BIG 12
CFB Zeitgeist Score
89
All-Conference in the position cohort. Carried by rec yards at the 97th percentile.
Heisman Heat
#1657
<1% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
<1%
TOP TE AWARD
Mackey
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 2 · StarterImpact starter. Producing measurable value above replacement.
Development Trajectory · receiving yards
2023–2025Up 12300% from first season to most-recent.
Career Arc
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 3-star | 0.8667 | No. 48 recruit | JUCO | Utah |
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No transfer portal moves on file for this player. | ||
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Achievements
Selector Grid · 2025
Selector recognition fills in once the major honors lists (AP, FWAA, AFCA, Walter Camp, Sporting News, SI) are scraped and ingested.
NIL · Recruiting · NFL Draft
Market value, pedigree & pro outcome
Recruit stars
★★★☆☆
to Utah
Composite
0.8667
#48 national
NFL Draft
2026 · Rd 7, Pick 40
#256 overall · Denver
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment ·
Belief Meter
—
Awaiting per-cohort signal
Top Take
“”
Trajectory
Rival Radar
No rival-bucket mentions in the current season.
2025 Signature · 2025 season
12.9
yds
All FBS WRs, min 20 receptions
Why it matters
#233 of 531 All FBS WRs at 12.9 yards per reception (48 catches).
Vs cohort
HIGH · n=48 cohort 531
Signature Moment
Week 1 vs Nebraska — 106 ypr
Result W 44-22
The week the volume broke through — put up 106 yds vs Nebraska.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the receiving totals stand
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
Dallen Bentley's story is about how role and output meet each other. For Utah, the card already shows enough current-season production to explain why he is on the serious-player board, and the next layer is determining whether the profile is just very good or actually distinctive.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
Target magnet | Big-play receiver against FBS receiving peers.
2025 season snapshot | final
Receiving
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 13 games
| Wk | Opp | REC | YDS | AVG | TD | LONG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | W 43-10@ UCLA | 5 | 31 | 6.2 | 1 | 8 | Season-high 106 yds |
| Wk 2 | W 63-9vs Cal Poly | 2 | 35 | 17.5 | 1 | 24 | |
| Wk 3 | W 31-6@ Wyoming | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 0 | 23 | |
| Wk 4 | L 10-34vs Texas Tech | 6 | 75 | 12.5 | 0 | 44 | |
| Wk 5 | W 48-14@ West Virginia | 5 | 59 | 11.8 | 1 | 21 | |
| Wk 7 | W 42-10vs Arizona State | 2 | 24 | 12.0 | 0 | 13 | |
| Wk 8 | L 21-24@ BYU | 4 | 65 | 16.3 | 0 | 32 | |
| Wk 9 | W 53-7vs Colorado | 2 | 34 | 17.0 | 0 | 25 | |
| Wk 10 | W 45-14vs Cincinnati | 2 | 14 | 7.0 | 0 | 8 | |
| Wk 12 | W 55-28@ Baylor | 3 | 48 | 16.0 | 1 | 25 | |
| Wk 13 | W 51-47vs Kansas State | 3 | 54 | 18.0 | 1 | 38 | |
| Wk 14 | W 31-21@ Kansas | 4 | 29 | 7.3 | 0 | 11 | |
| Bowl | W 44-22vs Nebraska | 6 | 106 | 17.7 | 1 | 45 | |
| Total | 48 | 620 | 13.1 | 6 | 45 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
The tight end's share of the passing offense, which helps distinguish a featured receiving tight end from a secondary option.
A blended usage view that shows how often the offense flows through the tight end compared with other same-level peers.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Receiving | Receptions | 48 | #9/475 | 98th pct | Volumevs FBS TE |
| Receiving | Receiving yards | 620 | #6/475 | 99th pct | Volumevs FBS TE |
| Receiving | Receiving TD | 6 | #6/475 | 99th pct | Scoringvs FBS TE |
| Receiving | Yards / catch | 12.9 | #94/475 | 80th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS TE |
| Usage | Pass share | 19.2% | #7/468 | 99th pct | Air-game usagevs FBS TE |
| Receiving | Receiving LONG | 45 | #50/475 | 90th pct | Metricvs FBS TE |
| Usage | Passing-down usage | 15.0% | #3/468 | 100th pct | Known-passing sharevs FBS TE |
| Usage | 3rd-down usage | 11.7% | #12/468 | 98th pct | Money-down loadvs FBS TE |
| Usage | 2nd-down usage | 9.5% | #16/468 | 97th pct | Middle-down loadvs FBS TE |
| Usage | Role share | 8.0% | #15/468 | 97th pct | Share of team offensevs FBS TE |
| Usage | Standard-down usage | 5.5% | #52/468 | 89th pct | Base-situation sharevs FBS TE |
| Usage | 1st-down usage | 5.3% | #67/468 | 86th pct | Early-down loadvs FBS TE |
| Usage | Rush share | 0.0% | #58/468 | 88th pct | Ground-game usagevs FBS TE |
| Ball Security | Fumbles lost | 0 | #1/55 | 100th pct | Turnoversvs FBS TE |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION · Rung None of 16
Why he’s here
Standing classification populates when honors, Heisman, and roster signals all align.
What moves him up
What moves him down
Accolade streams
The Mackey award tracker integrates per-week probability once a dedicated scraper for this award lands. Confirmed past winners and finalists for this player will surface here.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 13 games
Home vs Road
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home7g | 3.3 | 48.9 | 14.5 | 0.4 |
| Road6g | 4.2 | 46.3 | 11.5 | 0.5 |
Win vs Loss
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins11g | 3.5 | 43.6 | 12.9 | 0.5 |
| Losses2g | 5.0 | 70.0 | 14.4 | 0.0 |
First half vs Second half
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-77g | 4.3 | 53.7 | 12.7 | 0.6 |
| Weeks 8+6g | 3.0 | 40.7 | 13.6 | 0.3 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the TE cohort
Elite: rec yards (96th). Strength: receptions (94th).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Advanced Savant · TE · 2024
Advanced opponent-adjusted percentile bars are coming soon for this player.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
Dual-threat: blocks when needed, catches when needed. Coveted on both sides.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Mason Fairchild’s 2022 season.
Mason Fairchild
Jalin Conyers
Mason Fairchild
Oscar Cardenas
Peyton Hendershot
Matches Mason on
Differs from Mason on
Not enough data yet for this comparison.
As a junior, his production profile tracks closest to Cade Stover's junior season at Ohio State (2022).
Cade Stover
Tre Watson
Mark Redman
Ethan Conner
Kamari Morales
Matches Cade on
Differs from Cade on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Kyle Whittingham
Pass share
39.8%
371 pass / 562 run
Plays / game
71.8
13 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
4.2%
289 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Run-heavy.
Coaching Lineage · 2023–2025
1 coachPlayed his entire career under Kyle Whittingham.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
All-America, all-conference, player-of-the-week, watch-list, and postseason awards land here when they're earned. The absence is the signal: most players never collect formal honors, and that's its own kind of context.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No formal honors on the ledger yet. All-America, all-conference, weekly awards, watch lists, and postseason trophies land here when they’re earned. | ||||
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
Team, conference, and class by season.