CFB Zeitgeist Score
88
All-Conference in the position cohort. Carried by sacks at the 100th percentile.
Cashius Howell
Below the discourse floor — the honest stats-only state.
32 TACKLES · 12.5 SACKS
Where He Ended Up · NFL
Cincinnati2026 NFL rookie season
DE · TEXAS A&M · SEC
CFB Zeitgeist Score
88
All-Conference in the position cohort. Carried by sacks at the 100th percentile.
Heisman Heat
#9939
<1% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
<1%
TOP DEFENSE AWARD
Nagurski
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 2 · StarterImpact starter. Producing measurable value above replacement.
Career arc · Season-by-season Standing
4 seasons on the ladder
2021
Bowling Green · DE
—
2022
Bowling Green · DE
—
2023
Bowling Green · DE
R09 · All-Conference HM / 2nd team
Recognized
2025
Texas A&M · DE
R14 · Unanimous All-American
Elite
Career Arc
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 3-star | 0.8141 | No. 2162 recruit | HighSchool | Bowling Green |
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No transfer portal moves on file for this player. | ||
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Achievements
Selector Grid · 2025
Named Consensus All-American — recognized on 3+ of the 5 NCAA-recognized selector lists.
NIL · Recruiting · NFL Draft
Market value, pedigree & pro outcome
Recruit stars
★★★☆☆
to Bowling Green
Composite
0.8141
#2162 national
NFL Draft
2026 · Rd 2, Pick 9
#41 overall · Cincinnati
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment · Awaiting signal
The Room reads fan conversation around a player — who’s talking, what they believe, and how that shifts. It publishes once weekly volume rebuilds; for most players that’s in-season, when game-week chatter spikes.
Cohort divergence reads how different fanbases talk about this player. Returns once weekly mentions clear the publish floor.
Rival Radar
No rival-bucket mentions in the current season.
Signature Story
He hasn't written his page yet — we'll start filling it in when there are enough snaps to rank against his peers.
Signature Moment
No signature moment on the ledger yet.
Returns once this player puts together a multi-game body of work — single-game flashes alone don't clear the bar.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the defensive totals stand
✓ Hit 6-sack season · finished with 12.5.
✓ Hit 10-sack season · finished with 12.5.
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
Cashius Howell is trying to climb the steepest award hill in college football: a defensive candidacy. The hook is the disruption profile on Texas A&M's defense, with 12.5 sacks, 15.0 tackles for loss, and -- interceptions through the current loaded season. For a defender, the question is never just production; it is whether elite disruption and team context can become nationally undeniable.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
High-disruption defender | Coverage splash against FBS defenders.
2025 season snapshot | final
Tackling & Disruption
Coverage & Takeaways
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 13 games
| Wk | Opp | TKL | SOLO | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | W 42-24vs UTSA | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 2 | W 44-22vs Utah State | 4 | 4 | 3.0 | 3.0 | — | 0 | 3 sacks |
| Wk 3 | W 41-40@ Notre Dame | 3 | 2 | 1.0 | 0.0 | — | 1 | |
| Wk 5 | W 16-10vs Auburn | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 6 | W 31-9vs Mississippi State | 3 | 3 | 3.0 | 3.0 | — | 1 | 3 sacks |
| Wk 7 | W 34-17vs Florida | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | — | 1 | |
| Wk 8 | W 45-42@ Arkansas | 1 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 9 | W 49-25@ LSU | 2 | 2 | 2.0 | 2.0 | — | 0 | 2 sacks |
| Wk 11 | W 38-17@ Missouri | 5 | 1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | — | 0 | Season-high 5 tackles |
| Wk 12 | W 31-30vs South Carolina | 4 | 3 | 1.0 | 1.0 | — | 3 | |
| Wk 13 | W 48-0vs Samford | 1 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 14 | L 17-27@ Texas | 3 | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Bowl | L 3-10vs Miami | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Total | 32 | 21 | 15.0 | 12.5 | — | 6 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
| Season | Team | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Texas A&M | 32 | 21 | 15.0 | 12.5 | 6 | -- | -- |
| 2023 | Bowling Green | 27 | 15 | 10.5 | 9.5 | 1 | -- | -- |
| 2022 | Bowling Green | 20 | 6 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1 | -- | -- |
| 2021 | Bowling Green | 6 | 5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -- | -- | -- |
| Career | 4 loaded seasons | 85 | 47 | 28.0 | 24.0 | 8 | -- | -- |
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
TFL, sacks, and QB hurries are grouped together because defensive Heisman cases are usually built on visible havoc, not on tackle counts alone.
Pass breakups, interceptions, and forced fumbles matter because national awards voters respond to plays that change possessions and highlight reels.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defense | Total tackles | 32 | #1250/4942 | 75th pct | Volumevs FBS DEF |
| Defense | TFL | 15.0 | #21/4972 | 100th pct | Disruptionvs FBS DEF |
| Defense | Sacks | 12.5 | #3/4972 | 100th pct | Disruptionvs FBS DEF |
| Defense | Pass breakups | 6 | #144/2184 | 93rd pct | Coveragevs FBS DEF |
| Defense | QB hurries | 5 | #188/1878 | 90th pct | Disruptionvs FBS DEF |
| Defense | Solo tackles | 21 | #959/4584 | 79th pct | Volumevs FBS DEF |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
UNANIMOUS AA
UNANIMOUS AA · Rung 14 of 16
Why he’s here
Unanimous All-American — 1st team on all five NCAA-recognized selectors.
What moves him up
The only step up is a Player-of-the-Year invite.
What moves him down
Losing a selector drops this to Consensus.
Accolade streams
Named Consensus All-American — recognized on 3+ of the 5 NCAA-recognized selector lists.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 13 games
Home vs Road
| TKL/g | TFL/g | SACK/g | PD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home8g | 2.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 0.6 |
| Road5g | 2.8 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.2 |
Win vs Loss
| TKL/g | TFL/g | SACK/g | PD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins11g | 2.5 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 0.5 |
| Losses2g | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
First half vs Second half
| TKL/g | TFL/g | SACK/g | PD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-77g | 2.3 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 0.4 |
| Weeks 8+6g | 2.7 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.5 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the DE cohort
Elite: sacks (99th). Strength: tackles for loss (99th).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Advanced Savant · DE · 2024
Advanced opponent-adjusted percentile bars are coming soon for this player.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
Bends the edge and wins with first-step quickness. Lighter frame, relentless motor.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Cashius Howell’s 2023 season.
Cashius Howell
Ali Fayad
Ryan Henderson
Damon Wilson Jr.
Jonah Elliss
Matches Cashius on
Not enough data yet for this comparison.
As a graduate, his production profile tracks closest to Jordan Burch's graduate season at Oregon (2024).
Jordan Burch
Jereme Robinson
Jahfari Harvey
Romello Height
Michael Heldman
Matches Jordan on
Differs from Jordan on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Mike Elko
Pass share
45.8%
407 pass / 482 run
Plays / game
68.4
13 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
3.8%
286 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Run-leaning.
Coaching Lineage · 2021–2025
3 coachesPlayed under 3 different head coaches: Jimbo Fisher, Elijah Robinson, and Mike Elko. Multi-era developmental context.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Trophy Case · Confirmed honors
What the selectors said
ALL-AMERICA · CONSENSUS
Consensus AA (2025)
9 first-team selectors
ALL-CONFERENCE
All-Conf mention (2023)
All-MAC
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
National selector recognition is one of the strongest non-Heisman signals on a player card and should sit near the top of the showcase.
Conference-level recognition helps anchor whether a player is merely statistically loud or actually viewed as elite within his competitive lane.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | All-America (USA Today) | all_america | USA Today | DL |
| 2025 | All-America (SI) | all_america | SI | DL |
| 2025 | All-America (CBS) | all_america | CBS | DL |
| 2025 | All-America (The Athletic) | all_america | The Athletic | DL |
| 2025 | All-America (WCFF) | all_america | WCFF | DL |
| 2025 | All-America (SN) | all_america | SN | DL |
| 2025 | All-America (FWAA) | all_america | FWAA | DL |
| 2025 | All-America (AP) | all_america | AP | DL |
| 2025 | All-America (AFCA) | all_america | AFCA | DL |
| 2025 | All-America (Consensus) | all_america | Texas A&M | Consensus | -- |
| 2023 | All-MAC | all_conference | Bowling Green | MAC | LB |
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
| Season | Team | Role | Latest Model | Forecast | Win | Finalist | Official Finish | Points | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Texas A&M | DE4 | #9939 | #9731 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W16 snapshot | SEC |
| 2023 | Bowling Green | DE4 | #7730 | #8419 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W19 snapshot | Mid-American |
| 2022 | Bowling Green | DE4 | #11382 | #11733 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W20 snapshot | Mid-American |
| 2021 | Bowling Green | DE4 | #12793 | #12749 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W20 snapshot | Mid-American |
Team, conference, and class by season.
| Season | Team | Conference | Pos | Class | Bio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Texas A&M | SEC | DE | 4 | No. 9 | 6-2 | 248 lb | Kansas City, MO |
| 2024 | Texas A&M | SEC | DE | 4 | No. 9 | 6-2 | 248 lb | Kansas City, MO |
| 2023 | Bowling Green | Mid-American | DE | 4 | No. 9 | 6-2 | 248 lb | Kansas City, MO |
| 2022 | Bowling Green | Mid-American | DE | 4 | No. 9 | 6-2 | 248 lb | Kansas City, MO |
| 2021 | Bowling Green | Mid-American | DE | 4 | No. 9 | 6-2 | 248 lb | Kansas City, MO |